Accurate Proof and varification for Riemann Hypothesis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the verification of the Riemann Hypothesis, specifically addressing the integral \(\int \frac{1}{\ln(x)}\) and its root at \(\frac{1}{2}\) when \(s=2\). The conversation highlights the time series expansion of the logarithmic function and the application of Cauchy's principal value in evaluating the integral. The conclusion drawn is that the root of Riemann’s ξ function is indeed \(\frac{1}{2}\) when \(s=2\). Additionally, the discussion includes critical feedback on the proper use of mathematical notation and concepts related to the Riemann zeta function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann Hypothesis and its implications
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and logarithmic functions
  • Knowledge of Cauchy's principal value in calculus
  • Basic understanding of the Riemann zeta function
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Riemann zeta function and its non-trivial zeros
  • Explore advanced integral calculus techniques, including Cauchy's principal value
  • Learn about the logarithmic integral and its applications in number theory
  • Investigate the implications of the Riemann Hypothesis in modern mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers in number theory, and students studying advanced calculus who are interested in the Riemann Hypothesis and its verification methods.

imag94
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Accurate Proof verification of Riemann’s Hypothesis

Riemann Hypothesis states that \int \frac{1}{ln (x)} has a root at \frac{1}{2} when s=2

The time series expansion of Log function is,

\ln(x) = \frac {[x-1}{[x-2}+ \frac{1){3} \frac{x-3}{x-4} + \frac{1}{5}\frac{x-5}{x-6}+……. [\tex]<br /> Let it be equal to mx + c [\tex] because of the Linear nature of Log function.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Now,&lt;br /&gt; \int \frac{1}{ln(x)}=\int\frac{1}{mx+c}[\tex]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; If we take x=2 from Log function we can deduce m=0.35 and c= 0.0007&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Riemann stipulates that for any value x \int \frac{1}{ln (x) will have to be taken between limits 2 and x&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; So,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; \int^2 _1/2 \frac{1}{ln(x)} [\tex] is done using Cauchys principal number taken between 2 to 1 and from 1 to ½&amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; Which is, &amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; {\ln(035x1+0.0007)-\\ln(0.5x0.35+0.0007)} + {\ln(0.35x2 +0.0007)-\ln(0.35x1+0.0007)}[\tex]&amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;gt; Taking the proper order of integrations and signs we get&amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;gt; [-1.04782 + 0.35568]+[-1.04782+1.73897]=-0.69+0.69 =0[\tex]&amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; Which proves that the root of Riemann’s ξ function is 1/2 when s=2&amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;amp;amp;gt; Mathew Cherian
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathew, some words of advice:

1. Learn to use the [ tex ] feature properly. It is tex with a lowercase t, not Tex.

2. Learn to use the Preview button.

3. Learn what the Riemann zeta function is. Your integral is the logarithmic integral, not the Riemann zeta function.

4. Learn what the Riemann says. It says the all non-trivial (complex) zeros of the Riemann zeta hypothesis have real part = 1/2.

5. Learn how to do math.

6. Learn that this site has rules against posts of this sort.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K