Acute angle of right triangles

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Triangles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the acute angles of right triangles formed by a rectangle inscribed in a semicircle with a radius of 1. Participants explore the relationships between the angles and dimensions of the rectangle, considering both trigonometric and geometric approaches to the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether all acute angles of the right triangles are equal to 45 degrees, suggesting that all four triangles are similar and have hypotenuses equal to the radius of the semicircle.
  • Another participant counters this claim, stating that there are many different rectangles with varying angles depending on the rectangle's height.
  • A participant reflects on their confusion regarding the angles, noting that the resulting smaller rectangles may appear as squares.
  • One participant proposes a method using Pythagoras' Theorem to relate the height and width of the rectangle, leading to an equation that can be solved for the height.
  • Another participant suggests that trigonometry can also be used to determine the dimensions of the rectangle, leading to a conclusion that the angle phi could equal π/4.
  • Participants express that both trigonometric and geometric methods yield consistent results regarding the acute angles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the acute angles are all equal to 45 degrees, as there are competing views regarding the nature of the rectangles and their angles.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the specific dimensions of the rectangle and the assumptions made about the angles based on the rectangle's configuration.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We have a rectangle inside a semicircle with radius $1$ :

View attachment 9703

From the midpoint of the one side we draw a line to the opposite vertices and one line to the opposite edge.

View attachment 9704

Are the acute angles of the right triangles all equal to $45^{\circ}$ ? (Wondering)

All four triangles are similar, aren't they? We have that the hypotenuse of each right triangle is equal to $1$, since it is equal to the radius of the circle.
I am stuck right now about the angles. (Wondering)
 

Attachments

  • rechteck.JPG
    rechteck.JPG
    3.5 KB · Views: 130
  • triangles.JPG
    triangles.JPG
    4.3 KB · Views: 125
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A little thought should show you those statements are NOT true! There exist many different such rectangles, with many different such angles, depending on the height of the rectangle.
 
HallsofIvy said:
A little thought should show you those statements are NOT true! There exist many different such rectangles, with many different such angles, depending on the height of the rectangle.

In this case the resulting smaller rectangles look like squares and that's why maybe I got confused. (Doh)

So when we know that the area of the big rectangle is $1$ and we want to calculate the length of the sides, it is not a good idea to use trigonometry, right? (Wondering)

It is better to do the following:

View attachment 9705

Let $x$ be the height and $w$ the width. Since $M$ is the midpoint we get that $w=2y$.
At the right triangle we can Pythagoras' Theorem and we get that $y=\sqrt{1-x^2}$.
The area of the big rectangle is $1$ so we get that $x\cdot w=1 \Rightarrow x\cdot 2\sqrt{1-x^2}=1$ and from that eauation we can calculate $x$. Btw we would get the same result if we would consider the acute angles to be $45^{\circ}$, so in this case they are indeed like that.
 

Attachments

  • height.JPG
    height.JPG
    3.5 KB · Views: 140
Last edited by a moderator:
mathmari said:
So when we know that the area of the big rectangle is $1$ and we want to calculate the length of the sides, it is not a good idea to use trigonometry, right?

Hey mathmari!

We can do it with trigonometry as well.
The width of the rectangle is $2\cos\phi$ and the height is $\sin\phi$, isn't it? (Thinking)
So the area is:
$$2\cos\phi \cdot \sin\phi = \sin(2\phi) =1\implies \phi=\frac\pi 4$$

mathmari said:
Let $x$ be the height and $w$ the width. Since $M$ is the midpoint we get that $w=2y$.
At the right triangle we can Pythagoras' Theorem and we get that $y=\sqrt{1-x^2}$.
The area of the big rectangle is $1$ so we get that $x\cdot w=1 \Rightarrow x\cdot 2\sqrt{1-x^2}=1$ and from that eauation we can calculate $x$.

Btw we would get the same result if we would consider the acute angles to be $45^{\circ}$, so in this case they are indeed like that.

Yep. That works as well. (Nod)
 
Thanks a lot! 😇
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
148K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K