High School Adding a nacelle in front or behind the fan?

Click For Summary
Adding a nacelle in front or behind a pedestal fan can influence airspeed, but it generally reduces overall airflow due to increased restrictions. The relationship between area and velocity is governed by the equation Q=AV, where a decrease in area can lead to higher velocity at the cost of airflow. For cooling applications, the effectiveness of this trade-off depends on specific cooling needs and distances, as increased velocity may be beneficial for targeted cooling. However, there are limits to how much airflow can be sacrificed for velocity, and the optimal configuration varies based on the intended use. Ultimately, the decision should be based on the desired cooling effect and the specific setup of the fan.
boeing186
Can adding a nacelle in front or behind a standard pedestal fan affect the speed of the air coming in and out? If so, which is more beneficial: an intake nacelle or a nacelle in the front?

Using Q=AV, with Q being constant because of the fan blade's max speed, can affecting the area (A) create a noticeable difference in velocity (V)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
boeing186 said:
Can adding a nacelle in front or behind a standard pedestal fan affect the speed of the air coming in and out? If so, which is more beneficial: an intake nacelle or a nacelle in the front?

Using Q=AV, with Q being constant because of the fan blade's max speed, can affecting the area (A) create a noticeable difference in velocity (V)?
Welcome to PF!

It is difficult to know for sure and depends on exactly what you want to do with the fan. The general answer is yes, but there is a cost. Any restriction added to the fan will reduce the fan's airflow. So if you are OK with reducing the airflow to increase it's velocity, you can do that.
 
russ_watters said:
Welcome to PF!

It is difficult to know for sure and depends on exactly what you want to do with the fan. The general answer is yes, but there is a cost. Any restriction added to the fan will reduce the fan's airflow. So if you are OK with reducing the airflow to increase it's velocity, you can do that.

Thanks! And I see. So in fans used for cooling, is a decrease in airflow but an increase in velocity more beneficial than the other way around? And if so, is there a limit to this or an equation that I can use to find such a relationship?
 
boeing186 said:
Thanks! And I see. So in fans used for cooling, is a decrease in airflow but an increase in velocity more beneficial than the other way around? And if so, is there a limit to this or an equation that I can use to find such a relationship?
That would depend on the type of cooling being done.
 
russ_watters said:
That would depend on the type of cooling being done.

Sounds kinda stupid, but cooling myself up to two yards away
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
640
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K