Adding angular momenta using levi-civta symbol

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter geoduck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular Symbol
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on adding angular momenta of two spin-1 particles using the Levi-Civita symbol and the Kronecker delta. The Levi-Civita symbol is confirmed as a tensor under SO(3) rotations, allowing the construction of the j=1 triplet through the expression $$e_{ijk}|j\rangle |k\rangle$$. The confusion arises regarding the Kronecker delta's ability to produce the singlet state, which is clarified by the distinction between Cartesian and spherical bases. The relationship between these bases is essential for understanding the negative sign in the singlet state representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Levi-Civita symbol and its properties
  • Knowledge of the Kronecker delta and its role in tensor algebra
  • Basic concepts of SO(3) rotation groups
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Levi-Civita symbol in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between Cartesian and spherical bases in quantum systems
  • Learn about the construction of angular momentum states using group theory
  • Investigate the representation of higher angular momentum states, including quintuplets
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists working with angular momentum, and educators seeking to clarify concepts related to spin-1 particles and tensor algebra.

geoduck
Messages
257
Reaction score
2
Suppose you want to add 2 spin-1 particles.

I understand you can get the j=1 triplet by $$e_{ijk}|j\rangle |k\rangle $$ where i, j, k run from -1, 0 , 1.

The idea is that levi-civita symbol is a tensor under SO(3) rotations, so the contraction with the $$|j\rangle |k\rangle$$ tensor gives a vector under rotation, which is the triplet.

However, isn't kronecker delta also a tensor under rotation SO(3)? So why can't you get the singlet from:

$$\delta_{jk} |j\rangle |k\rangle = |1\rangle |1\rangle +|0\rangle |0\rangle+|-1\rangle |-1\rangle $$
Looking at the textbooks, the middle |00> term is with a negative sign.

Also, is there a group theoretic way to get the quintuplet?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aren't you confusing the Cartesian basis with the spherical basis? When you say |k>, k = ±1, 0, that's the spherical basis. The relationship between the two bases is

e+1 = - (ex + i ey)/√2
e0 = ez
e-1 = (ex - i ey)/√2

Take the Kronecker delta in the form of the identity matrix,

I = exex + eyey + ezez

rewrite it in terms of e±1 and e0, and you'll see where the minus sign comes from..
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks! I'm the grader for a graduate QM class, this will help the whole class.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K