Adding Up Resistors: Order of Operations Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter prettykitty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistors
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the correct approach to calculating equivalent resistance in a circuit involving resistors, specifically focusing on the arrangement of a 13-ohm resistor, a 24-ohm resistor, and another resistor positioned above them. Participants are exploring the definitions and relationships between resistors in series and parallel configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify their misunderstanding regarding the arrangement of resistors, questioning the order of operations in circuit analysis. Some participants provide definitions to highlight where the original poster's reasoning may have faltered.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the definitions of series and parallel configurations. There is a focus on clarifying misconceptions without reaching a consensus on the overall approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are addressing the definitions of circuit components and their configurations, with an emphasis on the importance of understanding these concepts in the context of the problem presented.

prettykitty
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have added an attachment of the circuit for clarity.

I initially began by assuming that the 13 ohm and 24 ohm resistors were in parallel and I got the Req for them. Then since the top resistor seemed to be in series with them I added its value. This is wrong of course, the correct sequence of steps is:

Treat the top resistor and the 13 ohm resistor as as if they are in series. Then with the attained Req add the 24 ohm resistor using the correct math for parallel resistors.

Where did my thinking originally go wrong?
My guess is that it has something to do with some sort of "order of operations" for circuits. Can that be clarified please?
 

Attachments

  • circuit.png
    circuit.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 460
Physics news on Phys.org
The 13-ohm and 24-ohm are simply, definitionally, not in parallel.
 
Yes great, I knew that already.
Can you be a little more helpful and explain why?
Statements of fact are of little help.
 
Sorry, I was just pointing out where your thinking originally went wrong:wink:.

By definitionally, I mean that thinking that the resistors (13 and 24-ohm) are in parallel violates the definition of "in parallel", which is: two elements are considered "in parallel" if they share common starting and ending nodes, which those two elements do not.

The top resistor and the 13-ohm are definitionally "in series" (connected end-to-end with no branching node in between).
 
Hey no problem, thanks a bunch!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
779