epsilonjon
- 57
- 0
Hi
I am working my way through Griffith's Introduction To Quantum Mechanics and I have got to the section on addition of spin angular momenta. I'll copy and paste the bit I'm struggling with, as it's easier than paraphrasing:
http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/2783/80183858.png
http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/1294/20886932.png
I'm assuming \chi_1 is the spin state of the electron and \chi_2 is the spin state of the proton. So why is the total state of the atom written as \chi_1\chi_2? Why not \chi_1 + \chi_2 or something different?
Secondly, he says that S^{(1)} acts only on \chi_1, and S^{(2)} acts only on \chi_2. Why is this, and how come S \equiv S^{(1)}+S^{(2)}? If the two particles are both spin 1/2 then aren't the matrices S^{(1)} and S^{(2)} both the same (i.e. just given by the 2x2 Pauli spin matrices)?
I think if I was clearer on those two points maybe the rest will make sense, so I will leave it there.
Thanks for any help!
Jon.
I am working my way through Griffith's Introduction To Quantum Mechanics and I have got to the section on addition of spin angular momenta. I'll copy and paste the bit I'm struggling with, as it's easier than paraphrasing:
http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/2783/80183858.png
http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/1294/20886932.png
I'm assuming \chi_1 is the spin state of the electron and \chi_2 is the spin state of the proton. So why is the total state of the atom written as \chi_1\chi_2? Why not \chi_1 + \chi_2 or something different?
Secondly, he says that S^{(1)} acts only on \chi_1, and S^{(2)} acts only on \chi_2. Why is this, and how come S \equiv S^{(1)}+S^{(2)}? If the two particles are both spin 1/2 then aren't the matrices S^{(1)} and S^{(2)} both the same (i.e. just given by the 2x2 Pauli spin matrices)?
I think if I was clearer on those two points maybe the rest will make sense, so I will leave it there.
Thanks for any help!
Jon.
Last edited by a moderator: