LS-Coupling: intuition why 2p^2 has no singlet P?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Twigg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intuition Singlet
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the LS-coupling scheme in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the configurations of two electrons in a 2p² state and the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle on the allowed term symbols. Participants explore the differences between microstate counting and angular momentum addition, particularly focusing on the existence of singlet and triplet states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their understanding of microstate counting for the 2p² configuration, identifying singlet S, triplet P, and singlet D states, but questions the absence of a singlet P state.
  • Another participant suggests that the discussion may hinge on whether the focus is on atomic electron orbitals or the center of mass (CM) system of two electrons, noting that two electrons in their CM frame must obey the rule L+S is even.
  • A later reply affirms that the antisymmetry of the orbital wavefunction for a P state necessitates a symmetric spin state, leading to a triplet configuration, thus reinforcing the Pauli exclusion principle.
  • One participant provides an example of the P state wavefunction, illustrating the antisymmetric nature of the orbital part and its implications for the spin state.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the Pauli principle and the nature of the allowed states, with some agreeing on the necessity of a triplet state for P configurations while others question the interpretations of microstate counting.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of angular momentum addition and the Pauli exclusion principle, which may not be universally applicable without further clarification of the system being analyzed.

Twigg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
893
Reaction score
483
I get the microstate-counting approach to finding the term symbols for a given configuration. But based on what I know about addition of angular momentum in quantum mechanics, I feel like there's a conceptual gap. When I do the microstate counting on the 2p##^{2}## configuration, I get singlet S, triplet P, and singlet D states. But when I add two electrons with l = 1 and s = 1/2, I get singlet S, singlet P, triplet P, and singlet D.
To clarify what I mean by adding these two electrons, I mean that I add the two orbital angular momenta l =1 to get values of L = 0,1,2, and I add the two spin angular momenta s = 1/2 to get values of S = 0,1. I then look at all six of these hypothetical states and eliminate the ones that violate the Pauli principle, namely the triplet D and triplet S. (These would violate the Pauli principle because they would require electrons with parallel spin AND parallel orbital angular momenta.) However, this leaves me with the extra singlet P state that does not appear in the microstate counting treatment. Where is my misconception here? What is forbidden about the singlet P state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you referring to atomic electron orbitals or the CM system of two electrons? In general, two electrons in their CM frame obey the rule L+S is even. (It can be derived from the Pauli rule.) I think its also true in any other frame but my mind is playing tricks on me (it happens when you get to 70!) and I can't be sure at this moment.
 
That actually makes sense, thanks! Even L + S would give you an antisymmetric spin state, and that would guarantee Pauli exclusion. Does that sound about right?
 
Yes.
 
Yes, this is due to the Pauli principle. Namely the orbital part of the wavefunction of a P state is antisymmetric with respect to exchange of the electrons, so the spin function has to be symmetric, i.e. a triplett. For example the P state with M= 1 is ##p_{+1}(1)p_{0}(2)-p_{0}(1)p_{+1}(2)##, while the state ##p_{+1}(1)p_{0}(2)+p_{0}(1)p_{+1}(2)## is the D-state with M=1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Twigg, DrClaude and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K