Addition of velocities: What actually happens?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Addition
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the addition of velocities in the context of special relativity, specifically addressing a scenario where a person on a spacecraft running towards the front of the ship may appear to exceed the speed of light. Participants explore the implications of relativistic effects on velocity measurements and the validity of Galilean velocity addition at high speeds.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a person running at 8 MPH inside a spacecraft moving close to the speed of light could be perceived as traveling faster than light relative to space.
  • Another participant asserts that Galilean velocity addition is invalid at relativistic speeds, emphasizing that it cannot be used for accurate calculations.
  • A third participant references a resource on relativistic velocity addition, explaining that absolute velocity is not meaningful, and provides a formula for calculating the resultant speed in the Earth's frame, which shows that the runner would not exceed the speed of light.
  • Concerns are raised about the terminology of "relative to space," suggesting it implies a background aether, which is considered problematic.
  • Some participants reiterate that Galilean velocity addition is always invalid in special relativity, although it may serve as an approximation at much lower speeds.
  • One participant illustrates the complexity of measuring speeds by questioning whether the speed increase is perceived differently by the runner versus an external observer.
  • Another participant discusses the effects of time dilation and length contraction in special relativity, noting that observers in different frames measure time and distance differently without any privileged reference frame.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Galilean velocity addition is not applicable at relativistic speeds. However, there is no consensus on the implications of the scenario presented, and multiple views on the interpretation of velocity measurements remain contested.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the implications of their arguments, particularly concerning the interpretation of velocities and the effects of relativistic measurements. The discussion highlights the complexity of these concepts without resolving the underlying questions.

Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
Say a spacecraft is traveling just a few miles per hour under the speed of light. Now say a person on board this spacecraft starts running towards the front of the ship. If the craft is already moving just under light speed, and the person inside is running at a speed of say 8MPH, isn't the person inside the ship actually traveling faster than light, relative to space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, because Galilean velocity addition is invalid when you are moving close to the speed of light.
 
See How Do You Add Velocities in Special Relativity? from John Baez's site. There is no such thing as absolute velocity so it doesn't make sense to talk about a ship moving at "just under light speed" in any absolute sense, but if the ship was moving at 0.9c in the frame of the Earth, and the runner was moving at 0.2c in the frame of the ship, then in the Earth's frame the runner would not be traveling at 1.1c, but only at (0.9c + 0.2c)/(1 + 0.9*0.2) = 1.1c/1.18 = 0.9322c, using the formula for relativistic velocity addition given in the link. This has to do with the fact that both the Earth and the ship use rulers and clocks at rest relative to themselves to measure velocities in their own frame, but each one observes the other guy's rulers to be shrunk and the other guy's clocks to be slowed-down and out-of-sync.
 
Holocene said:
...relative to space?

Sounds dangerous terminology. Try to get rid of the idea of some kind of background aether.
 
arildno said:
No, because Galilean velocity addition is invalid when you are moving close to the speed of light.

Of course, technically and special-relativistically speaking, Galilean velocity addition is always invalid.
As an approximation, it is okay for speeds much less than that of light.
 
Holocene said:
Say a spacecraft is traveling just a few miles per hour under the speed of light. Now say a person on board this spacecraft starts running towards the front of the ship. If the craft is already moving just under light speed, and the person inside is running at a speed of say 8MPH, isn't the person inside the ship actually traveling faster than light, relative to space?

As an illustration of the problem, ask yourself whether its 8 mph faster for him or for the observer that sees him going nearly at the speed of light. The first can be done, but not the second.
 
robphy said:
Of course, technically and special-relativistically speaking, Galilean velocity addition is always invalid.
As an approximation, it is okay for speeds much less than that of light.

It's 100% accurate if the velocities you are adding are zero-valued :-p
 
its all a consequence of how time and distance are measured in Special Relativity. Clocks moving at high speeds appear to slow down, and distances appear to shrink in the direction of motion when observed by an observer that is "at rest" The "at rest observer, however, has no privileged location - he simply considers himself at rests and makes observations about what is going on with clocks and rod lengths that are moving relative to him.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
9K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K