Additive identity over linear transformation

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that a linear transformation T maps the additive identity of vector space V, denoted as 0_v, to the additive identity of vector space W, denoted as 0_w. Participants explore the definition of additive identity and the properties of linear transformations, emphasizing the need for the additive inverse. A key argument presented is that T(0_v) can be expressed as T(0_v + 0_v), leading to the conclusion that T(0_v) must equal 0_w. The conversation highlights various approaches to simplify the proof while ensuring all necessary properties of linearity and additive identity are correctly applied. Ultimately, the consensus is that T(0_v) indeed equals 0_w, confirming the additive identity property under linear transformations.
autre
Messages
116
Reaction score
0
Given vector spaces V, W over a field, and linear transformation T:V\rightarrow W, prove T(0_{v})=0_{w} where 0_v and 0_w are additive identities of V and W.

I'm trying to use the definition of additive identity. So, \forall\vec{v}\in V,\vec{v}+0=\vec{v+0=0}. Where do I go from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't really see why v + 0 = 0... unless v = 0.
However, you may want to look at v + (-v) = 0.
 
Woops, I meant \forall\vec{v}\in V,\vec{v}+0=\vec{0+v=\vec{v}}. Not the additive inverse.
 
Yep, I guess you can use that as well.
You will still need the additive inverse at some point though (if not in V, then at least in W to show that T(v) - T(v) = 0W).
 
Here's a hint: Consider T(0_v+0_v).
 
Would this line of reasoning work?

T(0_{v})=T(0_{v}+0_{v})=T(0_{v}+\vec{v}-\vec{v}+0_{v})=T(0_{v}+\vec{v})-T(0_{v}+\vec{v})=T(\vec{v})-T(\vec{v})=\vec{w}-\vec{w}=0_{w}.
 
That looks good to me! In fact you can make it even simpler If you want by noting T(0_v)=T(0_v+0_v)=T(0_v) + T(0_v) which is only possible if T(0_v)=?
 
T(0_{v})=0_{w}, or the additive identity in W?
 
Exactly , it must be the zero of W.
 
  • #10
autre said:
Would this line of reasoning work?

T(0_{v})=T(0_{v}+0_{v})=T(0_{v}+\vec{v}-\vec{v}+0_{v})=T(0_{v}+\vec{v})-T(0_{v}+\vec{v})=T(\vec{v})-T(\vec{v})=\vec{w}-\vec{w}=0_{w}.
It's correct, but you're using the following two results without proving them
  • T(-x) is the additive inverse of T(x) for all x.
  • -0=0
The first one is no more obvious than the statement you're trying to prove.

If you're going to use these results, there's no need to involve a new vector v. You could just write T(0)=T(0+0)=T(0+(-0))=T(0)+T(-0)=T(0)-T(0)=0. I prefer the method Theorem suggested.
 
  • #11
An alternative way to write it down is:
T(0) = T(0 + 0) = T(0) + T(0) because of linearity.
Now add the additive inverse of T(0) (whatever it is, but there must be one) to both sides, and you get
T(0) + (-T(0)) = T(0) + T(0) + (-T(0))
0 = T(0)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K