Adiabatic PVT relationships - why Kelvin and not Celsius?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the necessity of using Kelvin instead of Celsius when solving adiabatic PVT (Pressure-Volume-Temperature) problems in thermodynamics. The Ideal Gas Law, which forms the basis of these calculations, relies on absolute temperature, making Kelvin the appropriate scale. The conversation highlights that Celsius is an arbitrary scale with no direct relation to thermodynamic quantities, emphasizing the importance of understanding temperature as a measure of molecular kinetic energy. Key references include Gerard Carrington's "Basic Thermodynamics," which outlines the derivation of the Ideal Gas Law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Ideal Gas Law
  • Familiarity with thermodynamic concepts
  • Knowledge of absolute temperature scales
  • Basic principles of kinetic theory of gases
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Ideal Gas Law in Gerard Carrington's "Basic Thermodynamics"
  • Learn about the significance of absolute temperature in thermodynamics
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic energy and temperature in gases
  • Investigate statistical physics and its treatment of energy units
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying thermodynamics and gas laws, as well as educators looking to clarify the importance of temperature scales in scientific calculations.

Taulant Sholla
Messages
96
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Here's a derivation of the adiabatic PVT relationships.

QUESTION: When solving adiabatic PVT homework problems I found that I needed to express temperature in Kelvin, rather than Celsius, to get the right answers. Where in this derivation should this be specified, and how should it be specified - or otherwise how should I know this?

Thank you!

adiabat p t v.PNG


Homework Equations


Adiabatic PVT equations.

The Attempt at a Solution


Please refer to question above. Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • adiabat p t v.PNG
    adiabat p t v.PNG
    36.7 KB · Views: 1,463
Physics news on Phys.org
My hunch is that the Ideal Gas Law is based on absolute temperature, which is the basis for all of this.
 
This is a fundamental concept in thermodynamics which I think you should have learned at the very beginning of any course. Temperature in a gas is a measure of the average kinetic energy of the molecules in the gas. This only goes to zero at absolute zero, so all of these expressions in thermodynamics only make sense when using an absolute temperature scale. The zero point of the Celsius scale is arbitrarily set at the freezing point of water. This zero point has no relation to the thermodynamic quantities.
 
Deriving the ideal gas equation is an exciting task in your early physics education.

It should presented as a key idea in either your basic or intermediate level courses at University. Most thermophysics books present it more or less elegantly since the argument is quite straightforward. See for example Gerard Carrington's Basic Thermodynamics Chapter 1. He derives PV=nkT first with what he calls a 'simple-minded' argument and then introduces (in my opinion unnecessary) complexity by completing the same task using integral sums.

The derivation involves the key ideas, (1) that pressure of gas is the intensity of it's molecular strikes against a side of their containing vessel, multiplied by the impacts' average momentum change which is the force they exert on the vessel's side and vice versa; and (2) that temperature is simply a way of measuring the kinetic energy of gas molecules (translational and internal) contained in the gas. The logic of the derivation also introduces k_b, the Boltzmann constant which translates between molecular kinetic energy and the measure of temperature. R - constant is k_b - constant for moles of gas, and the bare k_b is used when working directly with a certain number of gas molecules instead of moles of gas molecules. If you pursue statistical physics, you'll find the idea of temperature is dropped, and energies are talked of in their "natural" units of J and eV, with some occasional reference to what the energies might be when multiplied by k_b and thus expressed as temperatures.

Good luck!

I have a tendency of writing a lot when I think I know something, so any corrections to what I say are much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
729
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K