Adjoint operator in bra-ket notation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the adjoint operator in bra-ket notation within the context of quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the mathematical operations involving bra and ket vectors and their representations as matrices. Participants explore the implications of the adjoint operator's definition and seek clarification on the correct procedures for calculating expressions involving these operators.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to verify the equivalence <φ|Aψ> = using numerical values for the vectors and matrix involved.
  • Another participant explains that bra notation involves calculating the conjugate transpose of a vector, suggesting that to express
  • A participant questions the order of operations in calculating
  • Further clarification is provided that <ψ|A corresponds to the expression ψ†A in matrix notation, and similarly for
  • Another participant confirms that the components of the vector ψ in the expression (A†ψ)† are indeed the same as those of the ket vector |ψ> and expresses gratitude for the clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the operations involving adjoint operators and bra-ket notation. There is no consensus on the specific steps to take when calculating

Contextual Notes

Participants demonstrate uncertainty regarding the application of linear algebra rules to bra-ket notation, particularly in the context of matrix dimensions and the order of operations. The discussion reflects a reliance on numerical examples to explore these concepts.

xshadow
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi!

First of all I want apologize for my bad english!
Second, I'm doing a physical chemystry course about the main concepts of quantum mechanics !

The Professor has given to me this definition of "the adjoint operator":

<φ|Aψ> = <Aφ|ψ>

My purpose is to verificate this equivalence so i gave some numeric values at <φ|, ψ> and at the matrix A (rappresentative of an operator).
Then i calculate the expression <φ|Aψ> multiplicating,at first ,the product |Aψ> = A|ψ> and then doing the scalar product <φ|Aψ>...The bra and ket are 1x3 and 3x1 matrix respectively ,while A is 3x3.

Now my problem is to calculate the "other" expression: <Aφ|ψ>

Because this expression says to calculate first <Aφ|.
BUT i dont' know how to calculate this because according to the linear algebra i can't do the product between A and <φ| (i.e. <Aφ|=A<φ|. In fact it would be a product between a 3x3 matrix and a 1x3 vector...I'm not able to do this but only the product 1x3 | 3X3 at most...

So how can i calculate the expression <Aφ|ψ> using the linear algebra?? I have to shift the matrix in order to do that product (where?)or what??

Thanks very much! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A bra notation ##\langle \ldots |## is just the instruction to calculate the conjugate transpose of a vector it confines. To express something like ##\langle A^\dagger \phi |## in matrix notation, just first compute the matrix multiplication of the quantity inside the bra, and then take its conjugate transpose.
 
Hii!

I don't understand why i have to take its conjugate transpose. after having calculated Aφ|
To calculate <Aφ| ,assumed that i know the numerical values of the BRA <φ| and the matrix A what do i have to do?:

1) A<φ|

OR

2) <φ|A

Because i think that the relative order is important (the matric product usually is not commutative)...and the first expression according to linear algebra is not allowed ( matrix 3x3 * bra 1x3)

Thanks :)
 
##\langle \psi | A## means in traditional matrix notation ##\psi ^\dagger A##. Similarly, if you try to put the A inside the bra like ##\langle A^\dagger \psi |##, you'll have ##\left({A^\dagger}\psi \right)^\dagger##, which is the same thing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, xshadow and blue_leaf77
Lorran has explained the answer for me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: xshadow and Icaro Lorran
Thanks :)

Only one last thing please:

The components of the vector ψ in the traditional matrix expression (Aψ) (corresponding to the bra <Aψ| ) are the same components of the ket vector |ψ> ??

[FONT=MathJax_Math-italic]:)
 
xshadow said:
The components of the vector ψ in the traditional matrix expression (A†ψ)† (corresponding to the bra <A†ψ| ) are the same components of the ket vector |ψ> ??
Yes, they are the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: xshadow
Thanks :) !
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K