Adjoint Operator: Proving Unique Adjoint Transformation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter typhoonss821
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the adjoint operator in linear algebra, specifically focusing on proving the uniqueness of the adjoint transformation associated with a linear transformation between finite-dimensional inner product spaces. The scope includes theoretical exploration and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references Friedberg's textbook definition of the adjoint operator and poses a question about proving the uniqueness of the adjoint transformation.
  • Another participant introduces the idea of a second adjoint transformation, denoted as T**, suggesting that there may be multiple adjoints.
  • A further contribution outlines a method to demonstrate the existence of a unique adjoint by using an orthonormal basis for V, leading to a proposed formula for T*(y) based on the inner products involving T(v_i) and y.
  • One participant expresses appreciation for the contributions made in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on the uniqueness of the adjoint transformation, as the introduction of T** suggests the possibility of multiple adjoints. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the uniqueness claim.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not clarify the assumptions regarding the properties of the linear transformation T or the inner product spaces involved, which may affect the proof of uniqueness.

typhoonss821
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
I recently teach myself linear algebra with Friedberg's textbook.
And I have a question about adjoint operator, which is on p.367.

Definition Let T : V → W be a linear transformation where V and W are finite-dimensional inner product spaces with inner products <‧,‧> and <‧,‧>' respectively. A funtion T* : W → V is called an adjoint of T if <T(x),y>' = <x,T*(x)> for all x in V and y in W.

Then ,my question is how to prove that there is a unique adjoint T* of T ?

Can anyone give me some tips ? thanks^^
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume that there is another adjoint transformation, let's say T**.
 
To show that there exists such a function, let [tex]v_1, \ldots , v_n[/tex] be an orthonormal basis for V, so that [tex]x = \sum_i \langle x,v_i\rangle v_i[/tex] for any x in V then we have for all x in V and y in W:

[tex]\langle T(x), y\rangle ' = \langle T (\sum_i \langle x,v_i\rangle v_i ), y\rangle '[/tex]
[tex]= \sum_i \langle x, v_i\rangle \langle T(v_i), y\rangle '[/tex]
[tex]= \langle x, \sum_i \overline{ \langle T(v_i),y\rangle '} v_i\rangle[/tex]
which is in the form that we'd like.

Which shows that [tex]T^*(y) = \sum_i \overline{\langle T(v_i),y\rangle '} v_i[/tex] for all y in W works.
 
Last edited:
really appreciate^^
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K