I know that vector spaces have more structure as they are defined over fields and that modules are defined over rings. But it's hard to think of a situation where a using a ring clearly backfires. Is it just because a ring doesn't have an inverse for the second operation?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For a module over Z where addition has an inverse and multiplication doesn't, I could multiply a module element by an integer. Sure I might not be able to reverse it by division. But I could have just not multiplied in the first place. Or I could just keep track of where I came from by storing the previous location if I am using a computer, in that case it would just be more storage space.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Advantages of Vector Spaces over Modules

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Advantages Vector Spaces | Date |
---|---|

B Build an affine/vector space for physics | Yesterday at 3:58 PM |

I Understanding Hilbert Vector Spaces | Mar 2, 2018 |

I Can we construct a Lie algebra from the squares of SU(1,1) | Feb 24, 2018 |

I The vector triple product | Feb 15, 2018 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**