News Advice: How to stop your thread from being hijacked

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexandra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thread
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around strategies to prevent thread hijacking in online forums. Participants express concern over how off-topic posts can derail meaningful conversations, often attributing this behavior to a deliberate effort by some members to suppress dissenting views. Suggested solutions include ignoring irrelevant posts, alerting others to hijacking attempts, and allowing thread starters to moderate discussions. The need for references in claims is emphasized to enhance discussion quality, with some arguing that requiring references could deter participation. The conversation acknowledges that discussions naturally evolve, but stresses the importance of maintaining focus on the original topic to foster genuine debate. Overall, the participants advocate for a balance between allowing organic discussion flow and keeping conversations relevant.
  • #31
Smurf said:
You know it's always the most interesting members who get banned... TSM, Saint, that other guy with the weird name.

Rev Prez?

I'm (skirting a knucklerapping here and) wondering what thread I should look through to see just how naughty the smoking man was. :confused: Curious minds want to know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
pattylou said:
Rev Prez?
Not who I was thinking of, but him too!
 
  • #33
Don't forget that when a member is banned, the offensive posts are usually deleted.
 
  • #34
Smurf said:
You know it's always the most interesting members who get banned... TSM, Saint, that other guy with the weird name.

Shame.
Hundreds of members have been banned and you probabaly wouldn't recognize most of them. Many of them get banned very quickly.

See how easily threads get off topic? :-p
 
  • #35
Evo said:
Hundreds of members have been banned and you probabaly wouldn't recognize most of them. Many of them get banned very quickly.

See how easily threads get off topic? :-p
I miss TSM as well. :frown:

Getting back on topic.

I would try communicating to the offending hijacker that they are hijacking my thread. I would also try and make a very interesting on topic post to direct the dialogue back to the original topic. Unless of course the new topic is more interesting, then I believe that the post colud be a moved to a new thread.

Isn't that correct Evo?
 
  • #36
Skyhunter said:
I miss TSM as well. :frown:
Even I miss TSM, though we disagreed on some things, I look at the "whole" person and don't let minor disagreements affect how I see a person. I enjoyed at lot of his posts, mostly outside of P&WA. However, no one is above the law, if you want to post here, you need to abide by the rules.

Getting back on topic.

I would try communicating to the offending hijacker that they are hijacking my thread. I would also try and make a very interesting on topic post to direct the dialogue back to the original topic. Unless of course the new topic is more interesting, then I believe that the post colud be a moved to a new thread.

Isn't that correct Evo?
It's funny that some of the more interesting threads have actually been the "off topic" ones.

Yes, threads that go off topic can be split off into a new thread.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #37
Just a little fun

Skyhunter said:
I miss TSM as well. :frown:

Getting back on topic.

I would try communicating to the offending hijacker that they are hijacking my thread.

What thread, you call that a thread, that only shows that you don't know what you are talking about. Can you give a good source that would indicate to the average person that threads even exist?


I would also try and make a very interesting on topic post to direct the dialogue back to the original topic.

But your original topic wasn't even a topic it was just a suggestion that you may have once had a topic. Besides, without proving to me that topics exist everything you say is totally irrelevant to any topic.

Unless of course the new topic is more interesting, then I believe that the post colud be a moved to a new thread.

WHAT new thread? This is my thread now. You move your thread because you haven't convincingly displayed that you have the knowledge to even think of anything except garbage that does not even matter to anyone except communist sympathizing radical troublemakers.

Isn't that correct Evo?

How would EVO know? She is too brilliant to know anything about whatever it was that we were discussing before you started disagreeing with me. :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:
 
  • #38
I think the best way to keep things on topic is that there should be a rule saying you are only allowed to post replies of one sentence which must reaffirm the thoughts of the OP. Comments such as "Yes I agree" "I think your post is wonderful" or even "hear hear" (that last one is for the British contingent) should be the only ones allowed. Anybody with a dissenting view should start their own damned thread!
 
  • #39
edward said:
What thread, you call that a thread, that only shows that you don't know what you are talking about. Can you give a good source that would indicate to the average person that threads even exist?

But your original topic wasn't even a topic it was just a suggestion that you may have once had a topic. Besides, without proving to me that topics exist everything you say is totally irrelevant to any topic.
Philosophy forum! (I'm not allowed to post in the philosphy forum because, well, uhm :redface: I suggested they use logic :rolleyes: )

How would EVO know? She is too brilliant
hands one get out of banning free card to edward :approve:
 
  • #40
edward said:
How would EVO know? She is too brilliant to know anything about whatever it was that we were discussing before you started disagreeing with me. :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:

http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/5669/brownnose8cx.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #41
Quote:
How would EVO know? She is too brilliant
hands one get out of banning free card to edward

I too, would just like to say, that I think Evo is brilliant. Absolutely brilliant.
 
  • #42
pattylou said:
I too, would just like to say, that I think Evo is brilliant. Absolutely brilliant.
Slips two (yes two) get out of banning free cards into pattylou's computer. :-p

See how easy it is guys? :biggrin:
 
  • #43
hey! I'm marrying you and have yet to see a single get out of banning free card.
 
  • #44
Smurf said:
hey! I'm marrying you and have yet to see a single get out of banning free card.
You have diplomatic immunity. Until you make me mad. :devil:
 
  • #45
edward said:
What thread, you call that a thread, that only shows that you don't know what you are talking about. Can you give a good source that would indicate to the average person that threads even exist?

No! I will never reveal my sources!

edward said:
But your original topic wasn't even a topic it was just a suggestion that you may have once had a topic. Besides, without proving to me that topics exist everything you say is totally irrelevant to any topic.

I thought that was the whole point? You better check my logic.

edward said:
WHAT new thread? This is my thread now. You move your thread because you haven't convincingly displayed that you have the knowledge to even think of anything except garbage that does not even matter to anyone except communist sympathizing radical troublemakers.

Typical neo-fascist rant. Please provide some evidence to subsantiate your claims.

How would EVO know? She is too brilliant to know anything about whatever it was that we were discussing before you started disagreeing with me. :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:[/QUOTE]
You disagreed with me first! Oh most brilliant and all knowing Evo please tell him it is my thread and he can just go start his own!
 
  • #46
Hey! You guys have *totally* hijacked my thread
:smile: :smile: :smile:
 
  • #47
edward said:
What thread, you call that a thread, that only shows that you don't know what you are talking about. Can you give a good source that would indicate to the average person that threads even exist?

No! I will never reveal my sources!

edward said:
But your original topic wasn't even a topic it was just a suggestion that you may have once had a topic. Besides, without proving to me that topics exist everything you say is totally irrelevant to any topic.

I thought that was the whole point? You better check my logic.

edward said:
WHAT new thread? This is my thread now. You move your thread because you haven't convincingly displayed that you have the knowledge to even think of anything except garbage that does not even matter to anyone except communist sympathizing radical troublemakers.

Typical neo-fascist rant. Please provide some evidence to subsantiate your claims.

edward said:
How would EVO know? She is too brilliant to know anything about whatever it was that we were discussing before you started disagreeing with me. :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:
You disagreed with me first! Oh most brilliant and all knowing Evo please tell him it is my thread and he can just go start his own!
 
  • #48
Skyhunter said:
Oh most brilliant and all knowing Evo please tell him it is my thread and he can just go start his own!
Darn, I'm running out of "get out of banning free" passes. <shoves the last one into Skyhunter's computer> :-p
 
  • #49
Wow what's going on here? :eek: Hijacking a thread by a Mentor? :smile:


Evo, you're wonderful!
 
  • #50
Lisa! said:
Wow what's going on here? :eek: Hijacking a thread by a Mentor? :smile:


Evo, you're wonderful!
It's Evo's fault my thread has been so hijacked? Evo! Actually, it's been rather fun watching the total degeneration of this thread (which was a really silly idea in the first place!) :-p Well done, all :biggrin:

alex
 
  • #51
alexandra said:
It's Evo's fault my thread has been so hijacked? Evo! Actually, it's been rather fun watching the total degeneration of this thread (which was a really silly idea in the first place!) :-p Well done, all :biggrin:

alex
Actualy it was a very clever idea of you. :smile: At least people are more careful not to hijack a thread now.
 
  • #52
Lisa! said:
Actualy it was a very clever idea of you. :smile: At least people are more careful not to hijack a thread now.
Thanks, Lisa! It has settled down again now - for a while there, though, I was getting seriously worried that people were going overboard about this. I was starting to feel responsible for stifling debate (which was never my intention). But PF'ers are very wise so I don't think I did any lasting damage :smile:
 
  • #53
Evo said:
You have diplomatic immunity. Until you make me mad. :devil:
Woot! Evo baby, you're a charm.

HAHAHA! IN YO FACE PATTY-LOSER!
 
  • #54
Smurf said:
Woot! Evo baby, you're a charm.

HAHAHA! IN YO FACE PATTY-LOSER!
welcome bak smurf, missd u :!)
 
  • #55
outsider said:
welcome bak smurf, missd u :!)
Awwww how sweet. (I didn't think anyone in the political forum would miss me :-p)
 
  • #56
Well, no offense, but to be honest I didn't notice you were gone.

Still, I'm happy to become a fan. Can I get an autographed glossy 8x10? :smile:
 
  • #57
Here's Smurf 1
 
  • #58
Evo said:
Here's Smurf 1
Awww. He's so cute! Too bad aboot the Canadian accent.

Smurf, I'm never going to delete those messages in my inbox! (That's just to make the other girls jealous.) I'm saving them for when you're a famous cover model (or whatever handsome men do to become famous on their looks and charm.)

I have to agree -- :!)
 
  • #59
Now this thread is about 1 of the hijackers not hijacking!
 
  • #60
pattylou said:
Awww. He's so cute! Too bad aboot the Canadian accent.
You can put something big(like cake) in his mouth whenever he wants to talk!
So he has to saty quiet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
526
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
14K