Advice needed about rocket performances

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr Wu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rocket
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of a manned spacecraft powered by antimatter traveling to the Oort Cloud at a continuous thrust of 1.6 m/s², aiming to cover 2,000 AU in ten months. Key challenges include calculating the required mass ratio and fuel efficiency, with estimates suggesting that around 800 tons of antimatter would be needed for a round trip, depending on the efficiency of the antimatter reactor. Alternative propulsion methods, such as beamed energy or accelerating for a short duration followed by coasting, are proposed to reduce fuel requirements. The conversation highlights the immense energy demands of interstellar travel and the potential risks associated with carrying large amounts of antimatter. Overall, the feasibility of the mission is questioned, emphasizing the need for scientific plausibility within the narrative context.
  • #31
mfb said:
you would need 200,000 times this power
Dish size on Wu's spacecraft is also a factor in that multiple. Though as you point out, if the craft is powered by laser it can certainly communicate far more efficiently. Without googling, I wonder if NASA is considering such for future deep space spacecraft . Maybe the improvements in solid state laser power make this a possibility, or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
The factor 200,000 times is for spacecraft -> inner solar system only (and you can reduce it with a larger dish for the spacecraft ). For the other direction, you probably want a smaller dish and a larger sender power - if you increase power by a factor of 1000, you can reduce the dish size by a factor of 1000, reducing the 70m dish to a 2m dish (ignoring issues with angular resolution here).
And this is for radio waves. I did not find numbers (apart from the data transmission rate) for NASA's test, but apparently it gives better data rates with lower power.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
13K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
5K