MHB Alex's question at Yahoo Answers regarding maximizing viewing angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

How far from the screen should you stand to maximize your viewing angle?


An auditorium with a flat floor has a large screen on one wall. The lower edge of the screen is 3 ft above your eye level.

Optimization problem

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Alex,

First let's draw a diagram:

View attachment 1638

$$s$$ is the vertical height of the screen in feet.

$$h$$ is the vertical distance from the bottom of the screen to eye level in feet.

$$\theta$$ is the viewing angle, which we wish to maximize.

We see that using the definition of the tangent function, we may write:

(1) $$\tan(\beta)=\frac{h}{x}$$

(2) $$\tan(\beta+\theta)=\frac{h+s}{x}$$

Using the angle-sum identity for tangent, (2) may be expressed as:

$$\frac{\tan(\beta)+\tan(\theta)}{1-\tan(\beta)\tan(\theta)}=\frac{h+s}{x}$$

Using (1), this becomes:

$$\frac{\frac{h}{x}+\tan(\theta)}{1-\frac{h}{x}\tan(\theta)}=\frac{h+s}{x}$$

On the left, multiplying by $$1=\frac{x}{x}$$ we obtain:

$$\frac{h+x\tan(\theta)}{x-h\tan(\theta)}=\frac{h+s}{x}$$

Now we want to solve for $\tan(\theta)$. Cross-multiplying, we find:

$$hx+x^2\tan(\theta)=(h+s)x-h(h+s)\tan(\theta)$$

Adding through by $$h(h+2)\tan(\theta)-hx$$ we get:

$$h(h+s)\tan(\theta)+x^2\tan(\theta)=(h+s)x-hx=sx$$

Factoring the left side:

$$\left(x^2+h(h+s) \right)\tan(\theta)=sx$$

Dividing through by $$x^2+h(h+s)$$ we obtain:

$$\tan(\theta)=\frac{sx}{x^2+h(h+s)}$$

Now, differentiating with respect to $x$ and equating the result to zero to find the critical value(s), we find:

$$\sec^2(\theta)\frac{d\theta}{dx}=\frac{\left(x^2+h(h+s) \right)s-sx(2x)}{\left(x^2+h(h+s) \right)^2}=\frac{s\left(h(h+s)-x^2 \right)}{\left(x^2+h(h+s) \right)^2}=0$$

Multiply through by $$\cos^2(\theta)$$ to get:

$$\frac{d\theta}{dx}=\frac{s\cos^2(\theta)\left(h(h+s)-x^2 \right)}{\left(x^2+h(h+s) \right)^2}=0$$

Since we must have $$\theta<\frac{\pi}{2}$$, our only critical value comes from:

$$h(h+s)-x^2=0$$

Since $$0<x$$ we take the positive root:

$$x=\sqrt{h(h+s)}$$

Using the first derivative test, we see:

$$\left.\frac{d\theta}{dx} \right|_{x=\sqrt{\frac{h}{2}(h+s)}}=\frac{s\cos^2(\theta)\left(h(h+s)-\frac{h}{2}(h+s) \right)}{\left(\frac{h}{2}(h+s)+h(h+s) \right)^2}=\frac{s\cos^2(\theta)\left(\frac{h}{2}(h+s) \right)}{\left(\frac{3h}{2}(h+s) \right)^2}>0$$

$$\left.\frac{d\theta}{dx} \right|_{x=\sqrt{2h(h+s)}}= \frac{s\cos^2(\theta)\left(h(h+s)-2h(h+s) \right)}{\left(2h(h+s)+h(h+s) \right)^2}= -\frac{s\cos^2(\theta)\left(h(h+s) \right)}{\left(3h(h+s) \right)^2} <0$$

Thus, we conclude the critical value is at a maximum for $\theta$.

Now, using the given value $h=3\text{ ft}$, we find the distance $x$ from the screen that maximizes the viewing angle is given by:

$$x=\sqrt{3(3+s)}$$
 

Attachments

  • alexdiagram.jpg
    alexdiagram.jpg
    6.4 KB · Views: 137
Thanks for the break down! Adding points of interest in interval notation would be helpful: (0,\infty)
 
gerald jones thanks you
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top