MHB Algebra Problem About Quadratic Function

Joystar77
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
These 3 equations all describe the same quadratic function. What are the coordinates of the following points on the graph of the function? From which equation is each point most easily determined?

y = (x - 5) (x + 1)

y = x ^ 2 - 4x - 5

y = (x - 2) ^ 2 - 9

X-intercept, what are the points, equation, and explanation why that equation is the one

from which the x-intercepts are most easily determined?

Please tell me someone if this is correct or am I thinking of something else:

The simple way to graph y = (x - 5) (x + 1) is to generate at least four points, put those on graph paper and draw a straight line through them.

Here's how I generate the required points:

Use the equation, y = (x -5) (x + 1) and choose an integer for x, say x = 2, and substitute this into your equation to find the corresponding value of y.

y = (x - 5) (x + 1)

y = (2-5) (2 + 1)

y = (-3) (3)

y = -9

So, my first two points has coordinates of (2, -9). Now am I suppose to repeat this operation with a different value of x, say x = 4.

y = (x - 5) (x + 1)

y = (4 -5) (4 + 1)

y = (-1) (5)

y = -5

So, my second two points has coordinates of (4, -5).

Now mark these two locations on graph paper starting at the origin of my graph (where the x-axis crosses the y-axis), go to the right of 2 squares (x = 2) then down 9 squares
y = -9) and mark your first point.

For the second point, again, start at the origin and go right 4 squares (x = 4) and then down 5 squares (y = -5) and mark your second point.

Using a straight edge, draw a line joining these two points. You have now graphed the equation y = ( x -5) (x + 1).

Compare your graph with the graph of y = (x -5) (x + 1).

Am I starting this out right or am I thinking of something different? Please somebody let me know.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You are correct that the factored form:

$$y=(x-5)(x+1)$$

is the easiest form for determining the $x$-intercepts. These intercepts occur for $y=0$, and this factored form allows us to use the zero-factor property to quickly determine them by equating each factor to zero and solving for $x$.

As far as graphing the function, you need to observe that it is a quadratic function, and so its graph will be that of a parabola, not a straight line. For graphing, the easiest way is to use the vertex form:

$$y=(x-2)^2-9$$

and observe that this is simply the graph of $y=x^2$ translated two units to the right and nine units down. Its vertex is at $(2,-9)$.
 
Why is the equation y = (x - 2) ^2 - 9 the one out of all three equations listed below:

y = (x - 5) (x + 1)

y = x^2 - 4x - 5

y = (x - 2) ^2 - 9

the one from which the x-intercepts are most easily determined? Can you explain this?
 
Joystar1977 said:
Why is the equation y = (x - 2) ^2 - 9 the one out of all three equations listed below:

y = (x - 5) (x + 1)

y = x^2 - 4x - 5

y = (x - 2) ^2 - 9

the one from which the x-intercepts are most easily determined? Can you explain this?

It is the factored form:

$y=(x-5)(x+1)$

from which the $x$-intercepts are most easily determined, the reason for which I explained in my post above. However, the vertex form:

$$y=(x-2)^2-9$$

is the easiest to use for graphing purposes. :D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top