MHB Algebraic element - Minimal polynomial

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We suppose that $M/L/K$ are consecutive fields extensions and $a\in M$ is algebraic over $K$. I want to show that $a$ is algebraic also over $L$. I want to show also that the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $L$ divides the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $K$ (if we consider this polynomial as an element of $L[x]$). Then I want to conclude that the degree of $a$ over $L$ is, at most, equal to the degree of $a$ over $K$.

I have done the following:

Since $a\in M$ is algebraic over $K$, there is a non-zero $f(x)\in K[x]$ with $f(a)=0$.

Since $K\leq L$ we have that $f(x)\in L[x]$ and $f(a)=0$. Therefore, $a$ is algebraic also over $L$.

We have that $\text{Irr}(a,K)\mid f(x)$ and $\text{Irr}(a,K)\mid f(x)$, or not? (Wondering)

How could we continue to conclude that the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $L$ divides the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $K$ ? (Wondering) I haven't really understood the part "if we consider this polynomial as an element of $L[x]$"... (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since both $K,L$ are fields, we have that both $K[x],L[x]$ are Euclidean domains.

Let $m_K(x)$ be the minimal polynomial of $a$ in $K[x]$, and let $m_L(x)$ be the same in $L[x]$.

Since $K \leq L$, we can consider $m_K$ as an element of $L[x]$.

Apply the division algorithm in $L[x]$, to obtain:

$m_K(x) = q(x)m_L(x) + r(x)$ where $\text{deg}(r) < \text{deg}(m_L)$, or $r = 0$.

Assume that $r \neq 0$. We then have:

$0 = m_K(a) = q(a)m_L(a) + r(a) = q(a)\cdot 0 + r(a) = r(a)$.

Then $r(x) \in L[x]$ is a polynomial of lesser degree (than $m_L$) for which $r(a) = 0$, contradicting the minimality of $m_L$ over $L[x]$.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top