Algebraic element - Minimal polynomial

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the algebraic properties of field extensions, specifically showing that if \( a \) is algebraic over \( K \), then \( a \) is also algebraic over \( L \) in the context of consecutive field extensions \( M/L/K \). It establishes that the minimal polynomial \( m_L(x) \) of \( a \) over \( L \) divides the minimal polynomial \( m_K(x) \) of \( a \) over \( K \) when considered as elements of \( L[x] \). The conclusion drawn is that the degree of \( a \) over \( L \) is at most equal to the degree of \( a \) over \( K \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of field extensions and algebraic elements
  • Familiarity with minimal polynomials and their properties
  • Knowledge of the division algorithm in polynomial rings
  • Concept of Euclidean domains in the context of \( K[x] \) and \( L[x] \)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of algebraic extensions in field theory
  • Learn about the division algorithm for polynomials in \( L[x] \)
  • Explore the implications of minimal polynomials in algebraic field extensions
  • Investigate the relationship between degrees of algebraic elements over different fields
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in abstract algebra, field theory, and anyone studying algebraic structures and their properties.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We suppose that $M/L/K$ are consecutive fields extensions and $a\in M$ is algebraic over $K$. I want to show that $a$ is algebraic also over $L$. I want to show also that the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $L$ divides the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $K$ (if we consider this polynomial as an element of $L[x]$). Then I want to conclude that the degree of $a$ over $L$ is, at most, equal to the degree of $a$ over $K$.

I have done the following:

Since $a\in M$ is algebraic over $K$, there is a non-zero $f(x)\in K[x]$ with $f(a)=0$.

Since $K\leq L$ we have that $f(x)\in L[x]$ and $f(a)=0$. Therefore, $a$ is algebraic also over $L$.

We have that $\text{Irr}(a,K)\mid f(x)$ and $\text{Irr}(a,K)\mid f(x)$, or not? (Wondering)

How could we continue to conclude that the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $L$ divides the minimal polynomial of $a$ over $K$ ? (Wondering) I haven't really understood the part "if we consider this polynomial as an element of $L[x]$"... (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since both $K,L$ are fields, we have that both $K[x],L[x]$ are Euclidean domains.

Let $m_K(x)$ be the minimal polynomial of $a$ in $K[x]$, and let $m_L(x)$ be the same in $L[x]$.

Since $K \leq L$, we can consider $m_K$ as an element of $L[x]$.

Apply the division algorithm in $L[x]$, to obtain:

$m_K(x) = q(x)m_L(x) + r(x)$ where $\text{deg}(r) < \text{deg}(m_L)$, or $r = 0$.

Assume that $r \neq 0$. We then have:

$0 = m_K(a) = q(a)m_L(a) + r(a) = q(a)\cdot 0 + r(a) = r(a)$.

Then $r(x) \in L[x]$ is a polynomial of lesser degree (than $m_L$) for which $r(a) = 0$, contradicting the minimality of $m_L$ over $L[x]$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K