MHB Algebraic Extensions: Dummit & Foote Section 13.2, Example 2 pg 526 - Help!

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the degree of the field extension \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3})\) over \(\mathbb{Q}\) as presented in Dummit and Foote. It is established that the degree is at most 2, specifically if \(x^2 - 3\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})\). Participants clarify that \(\sqrt{3}\) is algebraic over \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})\) because it satisfies the polynomial \(x^2 - 3\), which has coefficients in \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})\). The reasoning concludes that both extensions \([\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3}):\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})]\) and \([\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}):\mathbb{Q}]\) equal 2, leading to the overall extension degree of 4. The discussion emphasizes the importance of confirming the irreducibility of the polynomials involved.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote on algebraic extensions. I am having some issues understanding Example 2 on page 526 - see attachment.

Example 2 on page 526 reads as follows:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2) Consider the field \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3} ) generated over \mathbb{Q} by \sqrt{2} and \sqrt{3}.

Since \sqrt{3} is of degree 2 over \mathbb{Q} the degree of the extension \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3} ) is at most 2 and is precisely 2 if and only if x^2 - 3 is irreducible over \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt{2} ). ... ... etc etc

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My question is: why exactly does it follow that the degree of the extension \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3} ) is at most 2 and is precisely 2 if and only if x^2 - 3 is irreducible over \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt{2} )?

Although I may be being pedantic I also have a concern about why exactly \sqrt{3} is of degree 2 over \mathbb{Q}. I know it is intuitively the case or it seems the case that the minimal polynomial is in this case x^2 - 3 but how do we demonstrate this for sure - or is it obvious? (I may be overthinking this??)

Can someone help with the above issues/problems?

Peter

[Note: This has also been posted on MHF]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Her Peter. This is related to your previous post http://mathhelpboards.com/linear-abstract-algebra-14/field-theory-algebrais-extensions-dummit-foote-section-13-2-a-6694.html

Peter said:
I am reading Dummit and Foote on algebraic extensions. I am having some issues understanding Example 2 on page 526 - see attachment.

Example 2 on page 526 reads as follows:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2) Consider the field \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3} ) generated over \mathbb{Q} by \sqrt{2} and \sqrt{3}.

Since \sqrt{3} is of degree 2 over \mathbb{Q} the degree of the extension \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3} ) is at most 2 and is precisely 2 if and only if x^2 - 3 is irreducible over \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt{2} ). ... ... etc etc

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My question is: why exactly does it follow that the degree of the extension \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3} ) is at most 2 and is precisely 2 if and only if x^2 - 3 is irreducible over \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt{2} )?
One thing you should always make sure is that whenever you talk about degree of the extension field $K$, you should also mention the field over which you are viewing $K$ as an extension. Here you say that the degree if the extension $\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3)$ is is at most two... You didn't mention over which field are you viewing $\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3)$ as an extension field.

What we can show is that the degree of $\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3)$ as an extension of $\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)$ is at most $2$. Say $F=\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)$ and $\alpha =\sqrt 3$. It is easy to see that $\alpha$ is algebraic over $F$ simply because $\alpha$ satisfies $x^2-3$ which is a polynomial over $F$. This also shows that $\deg m_\alpha$, where $m_\alpha$ is the minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ over $F$, is at most $2$. Thus $F(\alpha)\cong F[x]/\langle m_\alpha(x)\rangle$ is a vector space over $F$ with dimension $\deg m_\alpha$. This is same as saying that $[F(\alpha):F]=\deg m_\alpha$. But $\deg m_\alpha\leq 2$ and hence $[F(\alpha):F]\leq 2$. This is same as $[\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2, \sqrt 3):\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)]\leq 2$.
 
caffeinemachine said:
Her Peter. This is related to your previous post http://mathhelpboards.com/linear-abstract-algebra-14/field-theory-algebrais-extensions-dummit-foote-section-13-2-a-6694.htmlOne thing you should always make sure is that whenever you talk about degree of the extension field $K$, you should also mention the field over which you are viewing $K$ as an extension. Here you say that the degree if the extension $\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3)$ is is at most two... You didn't mention over which field are you viewing $\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3)$ as an extension field.

What we can show is that the degree of $\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3)$ as an extension of $\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)$ is at most $2$. Say $F=\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)$ and $\alpha =\sqrt 3$. It is easy to see that $\alpha$ is algebraic over $F$ simply because $\alpha$ satisfies $x^2-3$ which is a polynomial over $F$. This also shows that $\deg m_\alpha$, where $m_\alpha$ is the minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ over $F$, is at most $2$. Thus $F(\alpha)\cong F[x]/\langle m_\alpha(x)\rangle$ is a vector space over $F$ with dimension $\deg m_\alpha$. This is same as saying that $[F(\alpha):F]=\deg m_\alpha$. But $\deg m_\alpha\leq 2$ and hence $[F(\alpha):F]\leq 2$. This is same as $[\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2, \sqrt 3):\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)]\leq 2$.

Thanks Caffeinemachine.

So (to repeat your post a bit to emphasize a couple of points) to show that the degree of $$ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3) $$ as an extension of $$ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) $$ is at most 2, we take $$ F = \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) $$ and $$ \alpha =\sqrt 3 $$.Then we argue that $$ \alpha =\sqrt 3 $$ is algebraic over $$ F = \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) $$ because it satisfies the polynomial $$ x^2 - 3 $$.

$$ x^2 - 3 $$ is a polynomial over $$ F = \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) $$ because its coefficients (i.e. 1 and 3) are both in $$ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) $$

that is $$ \ 1 = 1 + 0 \star \sqrt 2$$

and $$ 3 = 3 + 0 \star \sqrt 2 $$


Then, given the above we have $$ [ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3) \ : \ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)] \le 2 $$ ... ... ... ... ... (1)

Now, similarly we can show that $$ [ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) \ : \ \mathbb Q] \le 2 $$ ... ... ... ... ... (2)

and the equality is actually the case in both (1) and (2) above because the polynomials concerned are irreducible (is that correct?)

So we have the following

$$ [ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3) \ : \ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)] = 2 $$

and

$$ [ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) \ : \ \mathbb Q] = 2 $$

So

$$ [\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3) \ : \ \mathbb Q] = [ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3) \ : \ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)] \ [ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) \ : \ \mathbb Q] = 4 $$

Can someone confirm that the above reasoning is correct ... or not?

Peter
 
Peter said:
Thanks Caffeinemachine.

So (to repeat your post a bit to emphasize a couple of points) to show that the degree of $$ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3) $$ as an extension of $$ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) $$ is at most 2, we take $$ F = \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) $$ and $$ \alpha =\sqrt 3 $$.Then we argue that $$ \alpha =\sqrt 3 $$ is algebraic over $$ F = \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) $$ because it satisfies the polynomial $$ x^2 - 3 $$.

$$ x^2 - 3 $$ is a polynomial over $$ F = \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) $$ because its coefficients (i.e. 1 and 3) are both in $$ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) $$

that is $$ \ 1 = 1 + 0 \star \sqrt 2$$

and $$ 3 = 3 + 0 \star \sqrt 2 $$


Then, given the above we have $$ [ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3) \ : \ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)] \le 2 $$ ... ... ... ... ... (1)

Now, similarly we can show that $$ [ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) \ : \ \mathbb Q] \le 2 $$ ... ... ... ... ... (2)

and the equality is actually the case in both (1) and (2) above because the polynomials concerned are irreducible (is that correct?)

So we have the following

$$ [ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3) \ : \ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)] = 2 $$

and

$$ [ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) \ : \ \mathbb Q] = 2 $$

So

$$ [\mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3) \ : \ \mathbb Q] = [ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2,\sqrt 3) \ : \ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2)] \ [ \mathbb Q(\sqrt 2) \ : \ \mathbb Q] = 4 $$

Can someone confirm that the above reasoning is correct ... or not?

Peter
Yes. This is correct. Only thing, I think you need to fill in some details as to why the polynomials in question were irreducibles. Otherwise it's fantastic.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K