Algebraic Methods for Solving Complicated Equations with Variable x

  • Thread starter Thread starter larry91
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
larry91
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody!

I have to solve the following equation using algebraic methods: a=? such as 2x + ax > 3x + 4x for any x from ℝ.

I solved it using analytical methods. Using The Rolle Theorem, but I don't want to solve it in that way! The solution for a is 6
 
Physics news on Phys.org
larry91 said:
Hi everybody!

I have to solve the following equation using algebraic methods: a=? such as 2x + ax > 3x + 4x for any x from ℝ.

I solved it using analytical methods. Using The Rolle Theorem, but I don't want to solve it in that way! The solution for a is 6

Be careful: as written, your inequality fails for the real value x = 0. Perhaps you meant "≥". (In Mathematics, we need to be precise!) Also, of course, a solution is _any_ a ≥ 6. Perhaps the question asked for the smallest such a?

Finally, why do you not want to use Rolle's theorem?

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
Be careful: as written, your inequality fails for the real value x = 0. Perhaps you meant "≥". (In Mathematics, we need to be precise!) Also, of course, a solution is _any_ a ≥ 6. Perhaps the question asked for the smallest such a?

Finally, why do you not want to use Rolle's theorem?

RGV

Yes! The smallest value for a! and there is ≥. Sorry!
Using Rolle's theorem is quite simple to solve it... I don't want to solve it 'cause I need a solution for it... I just want to find an approach through we can solve it using algebraic methods!