Algebraic Physics to Calculus based

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wraiine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the transition from algebra-based physics to calculus-based physics, exploring the differences in approach and understanding required for each. Participants share their experiences and seek resources to aid in this transition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks resources to help translate algebraic physics concepts into calculus-based understanding.
  • Another participant argues that algebra-based and calculus-based physics require fundamentally different approaches, suggesting that the former relies on formula application while the latter emphasizes understanding principles.
  • A question is raised about whether calculus-based physics necessitates a deeper understanding of fundamental physics compared to algebra-based physics.
  • A participant references Heisenberg and Schrödinger's development of quantum theory, noting that both algebra and calculus approaches were proven mathematically equivalent, implying that neither approach necessarily indicates a deeper understanding.
  • It is noted that university-level algebra and calculus are significantly more advanced than their high school versions, and both are necessary for higher-level physics study.
  • A participant mentions techniques like the Laplace transform that can simplify calculus problems into algebraic ones, suggesting a different direction than the original inquiry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether algebra-based and calculus-based physics imply different levels of understanding, with some asserting a clear distinction in approach while others highlight the equivalence of the two methods in certain contexts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best way to transition between the two.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the transition involves complexities and that the understanding of underlying principles in calculus-based physics may not directly correlate with the ease of algebra-based physics.

wraiine
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm taking university physics now, calculus based. I took algebraic physics in high school and did really well. But algebra is easy. Calculus can be confusing and what I'm looking for a site or a book that can help me translate algebraic physics into calculus. Does anybody know of any good sources?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can pretty much guarantee that the strategy "translate algebraic physics into calculus" will not work. They really have to be approached differently - algebra-based is much more "pick this formula for that problem" and calculus-based is much more "understand the underlying principles". Trying to fit one square peg into the other round hole is unlikely to work well.
 
Then calculus based physics requires a deeper understanding of fundamental physics than algebraic does?
 
Hm, Heisenberg and Schrödinger each developped their own quantum theory: the former using algebra, the latter using calculus. In the end it was proven both were mathematically equivalent. So I don't think one implies a deeper understanding that the other. I suppose the calculus is easier for interpretation, but that might also be a downside :o
 
You will find that both university algebra ( groups, rings, modules, linear algebra and so on) and university calculus are developed a long way beyond their high school counterparts.

To effectively study physics at higher level you will need both. There is some unifying theory as well, which helps when you have covered enough to draw it all together. In the beginning there is a huge amount of what seems like disparate material, but when you become more familiar you will see that there are many unifying threads and principles.

You will also find that, since algebra is inherently easier (or at least less laborious) than calculus, there are techniques, such as the Laplace transform, to reduce calculus questions to algebra ones. This is the opposite direction from your question. As Vanadium has said it is not recommended to try to go the other way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
886
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K