MHB Ali's question at Yahoo Answers (ker f)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Prove that every subspace U of a finite dimensional vector space V is the kernel of a linear transformation from V to V.

Please help, it seems quite obvious but I have no idea how to start.

Thanks.

Here is a link to the question:

Subspaces, kernel of vector spaces? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Ali,

Suppose that $B_U=\{u_1,\ldots,u_r\}$ is a basis of $U$. According to the incomplete basis theorem, there exist vectors $u_{r+1},\ldots,u_n$ such that $B_V=\{u_1,\ldots,u_n\}$ is a basis of $V$. Define the linear map $$f:V\to V,\qquad\left \{ \begin{matrix}f(u_i)=0&\mbox{if}&1\le i \le r\\ f(u_i)=u_i&\mbox{if}&r+1\le i \le n\end{matrix}\right.$$ The matrix of $f$ with respect to $B_V$ is diagonal by blocks:$$A=\begin{bmatrix}{0_{r\times r}}&{0_{r\times (n-r)}}\\{0_{(n-r)r\times r}}&{I_{(n-r)\times (n-r)}}\end{bmatrix}$$ Then, $x\in V$ (with coordinates $X=(x_j)^T$ with respect to $B_V$) belongs to $\ker f$ if and only if $AX=0$ or equivalently, if and only if $$X=(\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_r,0,\ldots,0)^T\quad (\alpha_i\in \mathbb{K})$$ which are the coordinates of all vectors of $U$. That is, $\ker f= U$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top