Alternate form of Dirac-delta function

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WilcoRogers
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the representation of the Dirac delta function, specifically the expression \(\delta(x) = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \frac{\sin(\frac{x}{\epsilon})}{\pi x}\). The integral property that must be satisfied is \(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \delta(x) f(x) dx = f(0)\). The user attempts integration by parts but struggles to extract \(f(0)\) from the limit as \(\epsilon\) approaches zero. The conversation suggests exploring alternative approaches or verifying the integration by parts method.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac delta function and its properties
  • Familiarity with limits and epsilon-delta definitions
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, particularly integration by parts
  • Basic concepts of Fourier analysis and sinc functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of the Dirac delta function in physics and engineering
  • Study the method of integration by parts in the context of distributions
  • Explore alternative representations of the Dirac delta function, such as the Gaussian approximation
  • Learn about the implications of the sinc function in signal processing
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students interested in advanced calculus, distribution theory, and signal processing applications.

WilcoRogers
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to show that:
[itex]\delta(x) = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \frac{\sin(\frac{x}{\epsilon})}{\pi x}[/itex]
Is a viable representation of the dirac delta function. More specifically, it has to satisfy:
[itex] \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \delta(x) f(x) dx = f(0)[/itex]

I know that the integral of sin(x)/x over the reals is [itex]\pi[/itex], and so far as I can tell, it doesn't depend on epsilon. What I've tried so far is integration by parts, which leads me to:
[itex] f(x) - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f'(x) dx[/itex]

Which isn't really getting me somewhere, and the limit drops off due to the integral not caring what epsilon is. Is there another way of approaching this? Or am I on the right track, I just can't pull out an f(0) from this.

Any help is appreciated,

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your integration by parts is correct, then I'd rather look for a counterexample.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K