Alternating Series Estimation Theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on using the power series for ln(x + 1) and the Estimation Theorem for the Alternating Series to determine the minimum number of terms required to approximate ln(2) with an error less than 3/1000. The series is defined as ln(x + 1) = Σ(-1)^n * x^n/n!. Participants identified that the correct value of x is 1, leading to the inequality |Sn - S| ≤ 3/1000. The confusion arose from misapplying the series expansion, with incorrect terms leading to erroneous calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of power series, specifically ln(x + 1) = Σ(-1)^n * x^n/n!
  • Familiarity with the Alternating Series Estimation Theorem
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating inequalities
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the Alternating Series Estimation Theorem
  • Practice solving problems involving Taylor series expansions, particularly for ln(x + 1)
  • Learn techniques for estimating series convergence without calculators
  • Explore common pitfalls in series expansions and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on series approximations and error estimation techniques. This discussion is beneficial for anyone preparing for exams that prohibit calculator use.

jlmccart03
Messages
175
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


Using the power series for ln(x + 1) and the Estimation Theorem for the Alternating Series, we conclude that the least number of terms in the series needed to approximate ln 2 with error < 3/1000 is: (i) 333 (ii) 534 (iii) 100 (iv) 9 (v) 201

Homework Equations


ln(x+1) = Σ(-1)^nx^n/n!

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the alternating series estimation thm is |Sn-S| ≤ (estimation) which is 3/1000. I get x to be equal to 1 since we want ln(2), but when I setup the equation I get lost on how to simplify this to a specific n value. (Calculators are not allowed on exam so I am rusty with algebra).

I get (-1)^n+1 * 2^n/(n+1)! ≤ 3/1000 which gives 2^n ≤ 3/1000 * (n+1) and I can't figure how to get the n in the exponent down without using ln yet the answers are specific numbers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jlmccart03 said:

Homework Statement


Using the power series for ln(x + 1) and the Estimation Theorem for the Alternating Series, we conclude that the least number of terms in the series needed to approximate ln 2 with error < 3/1000 is: (i) 333 (ii) 534 (iii) 100 (iv) 9 (v) 201

Homework Equations


ln(x+1) = Σ(-1)^nx^n/n!

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the alternating series estimation thm is |Sn-S| ≤ (estimation) which is 3/1000. I get x to be equal to 1 since we want ln(2), but when I setup the equation I get lost on how to simplify this to a specific n value. (Calculators are not allowed on exam so I am rusty with algebra).

I get (-1)^n+1 * 2^n/(n+1)! ≤ 3/1000 which gives 2^n ≤ 3/1000 * (n+1) and I can't figure how to get the n in the exponent down without using ln yet the answers are specific numbers.
For an alternating series, the estimated error is less than the magnitude of the term following the last one.
What is the Taylor series of ln(x+1) around x=0?
 
jlmccart03 said:

Homework Statement


Using the power series for ln(x + 1) and the Estimation Theorem for the Alternating Series, we conclude that the least number of terms in the series needed to approximate ln 2 with error < 3/1000 is: (i) 333 (ii) 534 (iii) 100 (iv) 9 (v) 201

Homework Equations


ln(x+1) = Σ(-1)^nx^n/n!

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the alternating series estimation thm is |Sn-S| ≤ (estimation) which is 3/1000. I get x to be equal to 1 since we want ln(2), but when I setup the equation I get lost on how to simplify this to a specific n value. (Calculators are not allowed on exam so I am rusty with algebra).

I get (-1)^n+1 * 2^n/(n+1)! ≤ 3/1000 which gives 2^n ≤ 3/1000 * (n+1) and I can't figure how to get the n in the exponent down without using ln yet the answers are specific numbers.

(1) You have the wrong series; your series is the expansion of ##e^{-x}##, which is not what was asked. The expansion of ##\ln(1+x)## is a lot simpler, and produces a problem solvable easily in an exam setting without a calculator.
(2) You say you need ##x = 1##, so how did ##1^n## become ##2^n##?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K