Alternating Series Test No Divergence?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Alternating Series Test is a method used to determine the convergence of alternating series of the form ∑(-1)^n a_n where a_n > 0. It requires two conditions: the sequence {a_n} must be eventually decreasing, and lim (n→∞) a_n = 0. If either condition fails, the test does not conclude divergence; rather, it remains inconclusive. However, if the second condition fails, it indicates divergence through the nth-term test.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series and sequences
  • Familiarity with convergence tests, specifically the nth-term test
  • Knowledge of limits and their properties
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the nth-term test for divergence in detail
  • Explore examples of alternating series that converge and diverge
  • Learn about absolute and conditional convergence
  • Investigate other convergence tests such as the Ratio Test and Root Test
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on series and convergence tests, as well as educators seeking to clarify the nuances of the Alternating Series Test.

jdawg
Messages
366
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Hey! So I just have a quick question. In my notes I wrote down that the alternating series test only proves absolute or conditional convergence, but can not prove divergence. Is this true or did I misunderstand my professor?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
jdawg said:

Homework Statement



Hey! So I just have a quick question. In my notes I wrote down that the alternating series test only proves absolute or conditional convergence, but can not prove divergence. Is this true or did I misunderstand my professor?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


The alternating series test says nothing about absolute convergence; both ##\sum\frac{(-1)^n}{n}## and ##\sum\frac{(-1)^n}{n^2}## converge by the alternating series test. The latter is absolutely convergent while the former is not.

Given an alternating series, i.e. a series of the form ##\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^na_n## with ##a_n>0##, the alternating series test has you check two things; (1) that ##\{a_n\}## is a (eventually) decreasing sequence and (2) that ##\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}a_n=0##. If either or both of these checks fails, then the alternating series test is technically inconclusive. There are some alternating series which fail the alternating series test and are convergent and some which fail and are divergent.

Put another way, the alternating series test says something along the lines of, "If we have an alternating series and (1) and (2) are true, then the series converges". It makes no claim if one or both of (1) and (2) are false, and it never concludes that a series is divergent.

But ...

In the event that a series fails part (2) of the test, then we can say that ##\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}a_n\neq 0##. It's not hard to see that this implies that ##\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}(-1)^na_n\neq 0##, and so the series is divergent by the ##n##th-term test/test for divergence (or whatever name your text/lecturer gives to that test). So you can learn enough about a series in the process of conducting the alternating series test to conclude, as a result of a different test, that the series is divergent.
 
Last edited:
The alternating series test is a test for convergence. But if the test fails to show convergence, that doesn't imply divergence. It might be convergent anyway and the alternating series test just isn't adequate to show it. All you can say is that the alternating series test failed to show convergence.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K