Alternative elastic collision formula / physical interpretation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around alternative formulas for final velocities in elastic collisions, specifically examining their equivalence to the standard formulas and exploring their physical interpretations. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications related to momentum and average mass in elastic collisions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents standard formulas for final velocities in elastic collisions and proposes alternative formulations involving total momentum and average mass.
  • Another participant questions the correctness of the alternative formulas and seeks a physical interpretation of the "momentum over average mass" term.
  • A subsequent reply suggests that in the center of mass system, the average velocities become zero, leading to a conclusion about the relationship between initial and final velocities.
  • Another participant confirms that for a one-dimensional system, the situation resembles a time reversal, while also extending the discussion to three-dimensional systems, emphasizing the conservation of momentum and the magnitudes of velocities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correctness and interpretation of the alternative formulas. While some agree on the implications in the center of mass system, the overall discussion remains unresolved regarding the validity and necessity of the standard formulas versus the alternatives.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about the nature of elastic collisions and the conditions under which the alternative formulas apply. There are also unresolved aspects regarding the physical interpretation of the terms involved.

bobdavis
Messages
19
Reaction score
8
Standard formula for final velocities ##v_1##, ##v_2## in elastic collision with masses ##m_1##, ##m_2## and initial velocities ##u_1##, ##u_2## is given by $$v_1 = \frac{m_1-m_2}{m_1+m_2}u_1+\frac{2m_2}{m_1+m_2}u_2$$$$v_2 = \frac{2m_1}{m_1+m_2}u_1+\frac{m_2-m_1}{m_1+m_2}u_2$$.

By rearranging terms this seems to be equivalent to $$v_1 = \frac{p}{\bar{m}}-u_1$$$$v_2 = \frac{p}{\bar{m}}-u_2$$ where ##p = m_1u_1+m_2u_2## is total momentum and ##\bar{m} = \frac{m_1+m_2}{2}## is average mass.

The term ##\frac{p}{\bar{m}}## seems to be the same as ##2v_c## where ##v_c## is the velocity of the center of mass of the system. By substituting this into the formula and rearranging it seems the formula is equivalent to $$\bar{v}_1=v_c$$$$\bar{v}_2=v_c$$ where ##\bar{v}_i=\frac{u_i+v_i}{2}## is the average of the initial and final velocities of particle ##i##

Are these alternative formulas correct and if so is there a good way to physically interpret these alternative formulas and the "momentum over average mass" term? If these formulas are correct is there a reason the seemingly more complex standard formula is used instead?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bobdavis said:
Are these alternative formulas correct and if so is there a good way to physically interpret these alternative formulas and the "momentum over average mass" term?
It is interpreted as Galilean transformed event that in Center of Mass system velocity of each particle does not changes its magnitude but signature by collision.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and bobdavis
I see so in the center of mass system ##v_c = 0## and the formula becomes $$\bar{v}_1=\frac{u_1+v_1}{2}=0$$$$\bar{v}_2=\frac{u_2+v_2}{2}=0$$ so $$v_1 = -u_1$$$$v_2=-u_2$$ ?
 
Yes, for 1D system as if a time reverse takes place.
For 3D system in COM system,
m_1\mathbf{u_1}+m_2\mathbf{u_2}=m_1\mathbf{v_1}+m_2\mathbf{v_2}=0
|\mathbf{u_1}|=|\mathbf{v_1}|
|\mathbf{u_2}|=|\mathbf{v_2}|
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K