Alternative form of Minkowski metric?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stanleyfapps
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Metric Minkowski
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transformation of the Minkowski metric as presented in Coleman and De Luccia's work on vacuum decay. The participants analyze the implications of analytic continuation, specifically the transformation from \[ds^2 = -d\xi ^2 - \rho (\xi )^2(d\Omega_S )^2\] to \[ds^2 = d\tau ^2 - \rho (i\tau )^2(d\Omega_T )^2\]. A key point of contention is the interpretation of \[\Omega_T\] and \[\Omega_S\], with participants seeking clarity on their dimensionality and the nature of the transformations that yield ordinary Minkowski space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski space and its metric properties
  • Familiarity with analytic continuation in mathematical physics
  • Knowledge of hyperbolic geometry and its applications
  • Basic concepts of solid angles in multi-dimensional spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of analytic continuation in general relativity
  • Study the differences between solid angles in two and three dimensions
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of hyperbolic geometry
  • Examine the role of vacuum decay in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students interested in general relativity, particularly those exploring the nuances of metric transformations and vacuum decay phenomena.

stanleyfapps
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've tried to find this addressed in other threads without success, so I apologize if it has already been addressed.

In Coleman and De Luccia (Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay), they suggest that by analytic continuation ([tex]\[\xi = i\tau \][/tex]):


[tex]\[ds^2 = -d\xi ^2 - \rho (\xi )^2(d\Omega_S )^2\][/tex]

becomes

[tex]\[ds^2 = d\tau ^2 - \rho (i\tau )^2(d\Omega_T )^2\][/tex]

and if [tex]\[\rho (\xi ) = \xi \][/tex], this is "ordinary Minkowski space." However, it doesn't look like Minkowski space to me. Does anyone know what transformation makes this look like ordinary Minkowski space?

How does this transform to look like Minkowski space?

[tex]\[ds^2 = d\tau ^2 + \tau^2(d\Omega_T )^2\][/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stanleyfapps said:
How does this transform to look like Minkowski space?

[tex]\[ds^2 = d\tau ^2 + \tau^2(d\Omega_T )^2\][/tex]

Is [itex]\Omega_T[/itex] a solid angle in two dimensions (theta and phi), or is it a solid angle in three dimensions (theta, phi, and some other angle like eta)? In other words, do you even have 4 dimensions total, or just 3?

What are the definitions of [itex]\Omega_S[/itex] and [itex]\Omega_T[/itex], and how do they differ from one another?
 
[tex]\[d\Omega_T \][/tex] is the element of length on a unit (3-dimensional) hyperboloid with spacelike normal vector in Minkowski space.

[tex]\[d\Omega_S\][/tex] is the element of length for a unit hyperboloid with timelike normal vector in Minkowski space.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K