Alternative histories and photon

  • Thread starter Thread starter peterpang1994
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon
peterpang1994
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Recently, I read a article talking about the average paths of single photons in a double-slit experiment(http://scienceblogs.com/principles/2011/06/watching_photons_interfere_obs.php ).

And I am a little bit confused with this experiment and the concept of Feynman's formulation of quantum theory in the double-slit experiment. The theory states that the particles, in this case photons, would take every paths from the source to the screen. And they would interference with themselves and causes the interference pattern.

The theory also states that if we observe the path of anyone of particles, the particle's would have only a single path and the interference pattern would be destroy.

But in this experiment, the scientist did observe the path of the photons how come they can still obtain the paths of the photons without destroying the pattern.

Any help or corrections would be great!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
thx a lot
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top