Alternatives to MS Equation Editor 3.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter vanmaiden
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around alternatives to Microsoft Equation Editor 3.0 for including mathematical notation in documents, particularly in MS Word. Participants explore various software options, their usability, and the learning curve associated with different types of editors, including LaTeX and MathType.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express dissatisfaction with MS Equation Editor 3.0, citing difficulties with constant revisions and copy-pasting of equations.
  • Others suggest that while there may not be a direct replacement that is significantly easier, different editors have varying strengths that might suit different users.
  • LaTeX is frequently recommended as a powerful alternative for writing papers, with some participants noting that it can output to various formats and is worth learning.
  • Participants mention that the learning curve for LaTeX is manageable, especially for those familiar with markup languages, with estimates of about a day to get started.
  • MathType is mentioned as a potential alternative, with features like handwriting recognition, though it has limitations based on operating systems.
  • Some participants discuss the availability of various LaTeX editors and plugins that integrate with existing word processors, emphasizing the flexibility of LaTeX.
  • There are suggestions to utilize copy and paste techniques with LaTeX or Equation Editor to streamline the process of including equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that MS Equation Editor 3.0 has limitations and that LaTeX is a favored alternative. However, there is no consensus on a single best solution, as preferences for different tools and workflows vary among users.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the choice of editor may depend on individual needs and experiences, and there are unresolved questions about the best practices for integrating these tools into existing workflows.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students, researchers, and professionals in STEM fields who are looking for efficient ways to include mathematical notation in their documents and are considering alternatives to MS Equation Editor 3.0.

vanmaiden
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
Is there a free program that can make the inclusion of proper mathematical notation (e.g. limits, sums, functions, etc.) in MS Word easier than Equation Editor 3.0? The last time I had to write a math paper, the hardest part of the process was the constant inputs of / revisions to equations and symbols.

Thank you!
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
The short answer is no.
Slightly longer: depends - different editors have different emphasis so your papers may be easier to write in them. However afaik, they all follow much the same paradigm.

You'll have noticed how useful PFLaTeX is in these forums?

You can also get a plugin that let's you use it in Word ... never used it myself though.
http://texpoint.necula.org/

What everyone at the high-end does, they use LaTeX to write the whole paper.
You can get powerful free programs that will let you write LaTeX documents for any platform and the discipline is well worth learning.

(These programs can output to almost any format and there are converters to any other format. So if a teacher is boorish enough to absolutely insist on Word files, you can still do that.)
 
Simon Bridge said:
What everyone at the high-end does, they use LaTeX to write the whole paper.
You can get powerful free programs that will let you write LaTeX documents for any platform and the discipline is well worth learning.

(These programs can output to almost any format and there are converters to any other format. So if a teacher is boorish enough to absolutely insist on Word files, you can still do that.)

How long would it take to pick up LaTeX?
 
It doesn't take too long, especially if you have any experience with other markup languages. If I remember correctly I took about a day to get going with it. (Some things, of course, are harder and take more time.)
 
I'd agree there - it took me about a day. My main issue was getting the document metadata sorted.

There are a range of editors - but I've always just used a text editor and run the latex engine from the commandline. Shop around.

There are lots of guides too:
The not so short introduction to LaTeX is a good one.
Typesetting math is pp49-63 in that, gives you an idea.
On top of which you get automatic numbering of equations and headings with the ability to add dynamic references.
You ca also change paper sizes with a few keystrokes without having to redo the layout.

You don't get as much choice in terms of fonts and layout as you do with Word, and the defaults include things you are not used to like wide margins.
The defaults have been worked out by people who have to read papers a lot - some of them, scores a day or more. This means that they have very firm and good ideas about what sort of layout makes a paper easy to read. LaTeX layout is a good start to getting an A - especially if all the others are using Word.
 
Last edited:
Have you looked at MathType http://www.dessci.com/en/products/mathtype/trial.asp ?
After the trial period, it becomes MathType lite, which [still] has support for \LaTeX.

I like the new feature of recognizing handwriting.
Unfortunately, this feature only seems to work for Windows 7... I wish this worked on Windows XP TabletPCs.

Alternatively, this came up in a google search: http://latexinword.sourceforge.net/ (I don't know much about it.)

On a side note, depending on the type of equations you write,
you could take advantage of copy and paste [and modify]... with LaTeX [as markup-text] or EquationEditor [as a metafile]. In addition, you could write programs [in perl, python, Maple, etc...] that write LaTeX.
 
LaTeX is well supported in a range of wysiwyg text editors ... including libre office. It's a case of googling for variations till you get one you like.
A thought everyone with XP tablets had upgraded to something linuxy by now?
 
Simon Bridge said:
A thought everyone with XP tablets had upgraded to something linuxy by now?

The only thing that comes close to the Inking experience on a XP-TabletPC is "Windows 7 [on a TabletPC]".
Linux doesn't quite do it as well. The so-called "tablets" (with touch, but not a true Wacom-based [or nTrig-based] digitizer) also fall short.
 
  • #10
jhae2.718 said:
It doesn't take too long, especially if you have any experience with other markup languages. If I remember correctly I took about a day to get going with it. (Some things, of course, are harder and take more time.)

Simon Bridge said:
I'd agree there - it took me about a day. My main issue was getting the document metadata sorted.

Great to hear! I don't want to knock MS Equation Editor 3.0 too much, but after writing my first math paper, the hardest part was the constant copy-and-pasting. I'll look into this.
 
  • #11
robphy said:
Have you looked at MathType http://www.dessci.com/en/products/mathtype/trial.asp ?
After the trial period, it becomes MathType lite, which [still] has support for \LaTeX.

Alternatively, this came up in a google search: http://latexinword.sourceforge.net/ (I don't know much about it.)

On a side note, depending on the type of equations you write,
you could take advantage of copy and paste [and modify]... with LaTeX [as markup-text] or EquationEditor [as a metafile]. In addition, you could write programs [in perl, python, Maple, etc...] that write LaTeX.

I have a friend that used the 30-day free trial and said it worked well. I'll play around with that too if one can still get use out of the program after the 30 days.
 
  • #12
vanmaiden said:
Great to hear! I don't want to knock MS Equation Editor 3.0 too much,
Oh no - it's fine for womping up a quickie equation if you don't need many of them - as you have found.
but after writing my first math paper, the hardest part was the constant copy-and-pasting. I'll look into this.
You'll have seen from the responses that using \LaTeX2e :) is very strongly favored.

You basically get to choose between a plugin for an existing wysiwyg editor, a gui especially for latex like Lyx, or the set of CLI tools that all these are based on and using them directly.
If you also have one of the linux's or BSD's, they come with all the latex tools already.

Naturally I prefer people to favor free/open source programs before restricted/proprietary ones. There's lots to choose from, happy hacking.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
320K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
27K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K