Am I missing anything in this box problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tibug
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box
Click For Summary
The problem involves two people pulling on a box with specific forces and angles, and a third person must exert a force to ensure the box moves to the right along the x-axis. The user calculated the y-component of the third force needed to balance the forces in the y-direction, concluding that the x-component could be zero since the existing forces are already in the x-direction. They determined the minimum force required for the third person to exert is 46.602 N in the negative y-direction, while acknowledging that any adjustment towards the x-axis would increase the overall force needed. The user expressed confidence in their solution but noted a tendency to second-guess their work after a night's sleep. Overall, they believe the calculated force is correct and minimal for the given conditions.
tibug
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi guys! I'm new here.

Here is the problem, verbatim: Two people pull to the right on a box with forces of 100 Newtons at an angle of 60 degrees with respect to the x-axis into the first quadrant and 80 Newtons at an angle of 20 degrees down into the fourth quadrant respectively. A third person is to also pull on the box to exert a force that when the three forces are combined, the box moves to the right along the x axis. What is the magnitude and direction of the MINIMUM force the third person should exert to make this happen?

My first source of confusion was this: I can find what the y-component of the third force is in order to zero any movement in the y-direction, but how do I know what x-component is required? I think I solved that problem by assuming that the problem assumes a frictionless surface, so the x-component of the force does not matter unless it is in the opposite direction. The forces on the box by persons 1. and 2. are in the x-direction anyways, so why would the third person need to exert a force in the x-direction? Is that reasonable or completely off?

With that assumption made, I made this equation:

V1y + V2y + V3y = 0

Substitute in the directions and magnitudes:

100N(sin60) + (-80N(sin30)) + (-V3y) = 0

Solve:

V3y = 46.602 N and (I assume V3x = 0)

When I go ahead and add x-components to find the vector of V1 + V2 + V3 = V4...

100(cos60) + 80(cos30) + 46.6(cos90) = 119.28

And then of course, V4 = √(119.28^2+0^2) = 119.28

So my V4 vector (the sum of the force on the box) is 119.28 N in the + x-direction.


I finished the problem but I feel like it's wrong, but I can't think of any reason why it would be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that you are required the MINIMUM force. Is your force such a minimum? Can you think of any force with a lesser or greater magnitude that the one you have found, which still satisfies the other requirements?
 
Thanks for the reply! I can't think of any force with a lesser magnitude that would satisfy the other requirements. The value of sine at 90 degrees is 1, so if I rotate V3 around the origin at all towards the x-axis, sine would decrease and the magnitude of the vector would have to be higher in order to provide 46.602N of force in the downward y-direction. And the magnitude in the x direction would increase. Of course, that means that I can think of forces of greater magnitude that would satisfy the other requirements. Any way I look at it, I can't think of a force less than 46 that would keep the box moving along the x axis.

I think I've got it right, but I may just need to sleep on it. That happened a lot with me in Calculus. I'd stay up late doing homework, get it done, then get up the next morning and I realize I did it wrong...I dream of Calculus...haha.

Again, thank you.
 
Your reasoning is entirely correctly. So sleep well :)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K