mheslep
Gold Member
- 364
- 719
Just follow the rules ("primary sources should be used whenever possible"). I've seen the NYT piece and heard the story before. The NYT is reputable, but "there is evidence" is not a primary source.Jack21222 said:How about you do your own research into well-known history? I'm not your history teacher.
Here, since you can't be bothered to educate yourself, let me help. Is the New York Times a good enough source for you? Or do I need to build a time machine for you so you can witness the slant drilling first-hand?
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/12/23/opinion/23iht-edcool.t.html?pagewanted=all