Amplitude's time dependence in Heisenberg representation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the time independence of the amplitude A in the Heisenberg representation, specifically expressed as A = ⟨q_f(t) | q_i(t)⟩. It is established that A depends solely on the reference point t_0, despite the apparent time dependence in the Schrödinger picture. The conversation highlights the significance of the eigenvectors |q(t)⟩ as eigenvectors of the operator 〈O(t)〉, governed by the Heisenberg equation of motion. The unitary nature of time evolution ensures that the scalar product ⟨q(t)|q'(t)⟩ remains time-independent, equating to the initial scalar product ⟨q(0)|q'(0)⟩.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Heisenberg representation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Schrödinger picture and time evolution
  • Knowledge of eigenvectors and operators in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of unitary transformations and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Heisenberg equation of motion in detail
  • Explore the implications of unitary time evolution in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties of eigenvectors in quantum systems
  • Investigate the differences between Heisenberg and Schrödinger pictures
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the foundations of quantum theory will benefit from this discussion.

LayMuon
Messages
149
Reaction score
1
[tex] <br /> A = \langle q_f(t) \mid q_i(t) \rangle = \langle q_{f,H} \mid e^{iH(t_0-t)} e^{-iH(t-t_0)} \mid q_{i,H} \rangle = \langle q_{f,H} \mid q_{i,H} \rangle<br /> [/tex]

This means that A is time-independent, and depends only on the reference point ##t_0##. How is it possibly? From Schoedinger picture it does depend on time! Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to be careful about the meaning of your vectors. From what you write, I conclude that [itex]|q(t) \rangle[/itex] are the (generalized) eigenvectors of some operator representing an observable in the Heisenberg picture. Then, from the Heisenberg equation of motion
[tex]\mathrm{d}_t \hat{O}=\frac{1}{\mathrm{i}}[\hat{O},\hat{H}].[/tex]
Assuming we have time independent Hamiltonian and that implies
[tex]\hat{O}(t)=\exp(\mathrm{i} t \hat{H}) \hat{O}(0) \exp(-\mathrm{i} t \hat{H}).[/tex] For sake of simplicity, I've set [itex]t_0=0[/itex].

Now by definition [itex]|q(t) \rangle[/itex] is the eigenvector of [itex]\hat{O}(t)[/itex] with the fixed eigenvalue [itex]q[/itex]:
[tex]\forall t: \quad \hat{O}(t) |q(t) \rangle=q |q(t) \rangle.[/tex]
This implies that
[tex]|q(t) \rangle=\exp(\mathrm{i} t \hat{H}) |q(0) \rangle.[/tex]
So up to a sign this implies your formula.

Of course, because the time evolution is unitary, the scalar product is time independent
[tex]\langle q(t)|q'(t) \rangle=\langle q(0) | q'(0) \rangle=\delta(q,q'),[/tex]
where the [itex]\delta[/itex] stands for a Kronecker [itex]\delta[/itex] (discrete eigenvalues) or a Dirac [itex]\delta[/itex] distribution (continuous eigenvalues).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K