Amplitude's time dependence in Heisenberg representation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
LayMuon
Messages
149
Reaction score
1
[tex] <br /> A = \langle q_f(t) \mid q_i(t) \rangle = \langle q_{f,H} \mid e^{iH(t_0-t)} e^{-iH(t-t_0)} \mid q_{i,H} \rangle = \langle q_{f,H} \mid q_{i,H} \rangle<br /> [/tex]

This means that A is time-independent, and depends only on the reference point ##t_0##. How is it possibly? From Schoedinger picture it does depend on time! Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to be careful about the meaning of your vectors. From what you write, I conclude that [itex]|q(t) \rangle[/itex] are the (generalized) eigenvectors of some operator representing an observable in the Heisenberg picture. Then, from the Heisenberg equation of motion
[tex]\mathrm{d}_t \hat{O}=\frac{1}{\mathrm{i}}[\hat{O},\hat{H}].[/tex]
Assuming we have time independent Hamiltonian and that implies
[tex]\hat{O}(t)=\exp(\mathrm{i} t \hat{H}) \hat{O}(0) \exp(-\mathrm{i} t \hat{H}).[/tex] For sake of simplicity, I've set [itex]t_0=0[/itex].

Now by definition [itex]|q(t) \rangle[/itex] is the eigenvector of [itex]\hat{O}(t)[/itex] with the fixed eigenvalue [itex]q[/itex]:
[tex]\forall t: \quad \hat{O}(t) |q(t) \rangle=q |q(t) \rangle.[/tex]
This implies that
[tex]|q(t) \rangle=\exp(\mathrm{i} t \hat{H}) |q(0) \rangle.[/tex]
So up to a sign this implies your formula.

Of course, because the time evolution is unitary, the scalar product is time independent
[tex]\langle q(t)|q'(t) \rangle=\langle q(0) | q'(0) \rangle=\delta(q,q'),[/tex]
where the [itex]\delta[/itex] stands for a Kronecker [itex]\delta[/itex] (discrete eigenvalues) or a Dirac [itex]\delta[/itex] distribution (continuous eigenvalues).