MHB An absurdly interesting radical....

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the limit $$\text{limit}_{\, \epsilon \to 0^{+}}\sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{ \epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \cdots} } } } = 1$$ and the challenge of proving it. Participants explore the definition of the expression as a limit of a sequence defined by a difference equation. They identify attractive and repulsive fixed points, concluding that the limit approaches 1 as epsilon approaches 0, despite the function equating to 0 at epsilon equals 0. The conversation highlights the complexity and intrigue of the limit, inviting further exploration and proof.
DreamWeaver
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
Here's an interesting limit I found the other day...$$\text{limit}_{\, \epsilon \to 0^{+}}\sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{ \epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \cdots} } } } = 1$$It's both obvious and yet elusive... Any ideas on how to prove it...?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Incidentally, I'm only part-way toward a proof myself, so I don't have the answer yet. But still, it's both a Challenge and a Puzzle, so I thought of this board... (Heidy)
 
DreamWeaver said:
Here's an interesting limit I found the other day...$$\text{limit}_{\, \epsilon \to 0^{+}}\sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{ \epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \cdots} } } } = 1$$It's both obvious and yet elusive... Any ideas on how to prove it...?

Setting $\displaystyle x = f(\varepsilon)$ the x must satisfy the equation $\displaystyle \sqrt{\varepsilon + x} = x$ and, if You suppose that thye only positive value of a square root must be considered, the explicit expression of f(*) is... $\displaystyle f(\varepsilon) = \frac{1 + \sqrt{1 + 4\ \varepsilon}}{2}\ (1)$ ... and observing (1) it seems to be $\displaystyle \lim_{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0} f(\varepsilon) = 1$. However we have to consider that we are evaluating the 'limit of a limit' like $\displaystyle \lim _{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0}\ \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \text {of something}$ and the result can be different if You invert the order of limits and evaluate $\displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\ \lim_{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0}\ \text {of something}$. For this reason also the alternative... $\displaystyle f(\varepsilon) = \frac{1 - \sqrt{1 + 4\ \varepsilon}}{2}\ (2)$

... [supposing to consider the negative value of the square root...] should be considered and in this case is $\displaystyle \lim_{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0} f(\varepsilon) = 0$. All that in any case requires more investigation...
Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
A so called crank used this to prove that $1 = 0$ quite a few days ago in MMF : http://www.mymathforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=44831
 
DreamWeaver said:
Here's an interesting limit I found the other day...$$\text{limit}_{\, \epsilon \to 0^{+}}\sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{ \epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \cdots} } } } = 1$$It's both obvious and yet elusive... Any ideas on how to prove it...?

In order to get a correct answer to the question You have to clarify what the expression $\displaystyle f(\epsilon)= \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{ \epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \cdots} } } }$ means. In effect is $\displaystyle f(\epsilon) = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n}$ where $a_{n}$ satisfy the difference equation... $\displaystyle a_{n+1} = \sqrt{a_{n} + \epsilon},\ a_{0}= \epsilon\ (1)$

Analysing (1) You imposing the condition $\Delta_{n} = a_{n+1} - a_{n} =0$ You find that that there is an attractive fixed point in $\displaystyle x_{1} = \frac{1 + \sqrt{1 + 4\ \epsilon}}{2}$ and a repulsive fixed point in $\displaystyle x_{0} = \frac{1 - \sqrt{1 + 4\ \epsilon}}{2}$ and that means that for any $\displaystyle x_{0} < \epsilon < x_{1}$ is $\displaystyle f(\epsilon) = x_{1} = \frac{1 + \sqrt{1 + 4\ \epsilon}}{2}$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} f(\epsilon)=1$, even if [and that is an important detail...] is $\displaystyle f(0)=0$... Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
I am not sure if this actually works (there might be something missing) but here goes:

[sp]Suppose $\sqrt{a + \sqrt{a + \sqrt{a + \cdots}}} = a^*$, $\sqrt{b + \sqrt{b + \sqrt{b + \cdots}}} = b^*$, and $0 < a < b$.

Then $a^* = \frac{1 + \sqrt{1 + 4a}}{2}$ and $b^* = \frac{1 + \sqrt{1 + 4b}}{2}$ therefore it follows that $a^* < b^*$.

Now suppose that $a^* < 1$. This leads to the contradiction that $\sqrt{1 + 4a} < 1$. Therefore $a^* \geq 1$, so $1 \leq a^* < b^*$.

Therefore $a^*$ goes to $1$ as $a$ goes to $0$.

$\blacksquare$[/sp]
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K