An absurdly interesting radical....

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DreamWeaver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting Radical
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the limit $$\text{limit}_{\, \epsilon \to 0^{+}}\sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{ \epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \cdots} } } } = 1$$ Participants explore the implications of this limit, its proof, and related mathematical concepts, with a focus on both theoretical and exploratory reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express interest in proving the limit, noting its apparent obviousness yet elusive nature.
  • One participant suggests that the expression can be defined as $$f(\epsilon)= \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{ \epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \cdots} } } }$$ and proposes a recursive relationship to analyze it.
  • This participant identifies attractive and repulsive fixed points in the context of the recursive sequence, leading to the conclusion that $$\lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} f(\epsilon)=1$$ while noting that $$f(0)=0$$.
  • Another participant presents a comparison between two similar limits, $$a^*$$ and $$b^*$$, and argues that if $$a^* < 1$$ leads to a contradiction, then it follows that $$a^* \geq 1$$, suggesting that $$a^*$$ approaches 1 as $$a$$ approaches 0.
  • Concerns are raised about potential missing elements in the reasoning, indicating uncertainty in the proposed proofs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the proof of the limit. There are multiple competing views and approaches to understanding the limit, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the validity of their arguments.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of clarifying the definition of the recursive expression and the conditions under which the limit is evaluated. There is an acknowledgment of potential gaps in the reasoning presented.

DreamWeaver
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
Here's an interesting limit I found the other day...$$\text{limit}_{\, \epsilon \to 0^{+}}\sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{ \epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \cdots} } } } = 1$$It's both obvious and yet elusive... Any ideas on how to prove it...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Incidentally, I'm only part-way toward a proof myself, so I don't have the answer yet. But still, it's both a Challenge and a Puzzle, so I thought of this board... (Heidy)
 
DreamWeaver said:
Here's an interesting limit I found the other day...$$\text{limit}_{\, \epsilon \to 0^{+}}\sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{ \epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \cdots} } } } = 1$$It's both obvious and yet elusive... Any ideas on how to prove it...?

Setting $\displaystyle x = f(\varepsilon)$ the x must satisfy the equation $\displaystyle \sqrt{\varepsilon + x} = x$ and, if You suppose that thye only positive value of a square root must be considered, the explicit expression of f(*) is... $\displaystyle f(\varepsilon) = \frac{1 + \sqrt{1 + 4\ \varepsilon}}{2}\ (1)$ ... and observing (1) it seems to be $\displaystyle \lim_{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0} f(\varepsilon) = 1$. However we have to consider that we are evaluating the 'limit of a limit' like $\displaystyle \lim _{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0}\ \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \text {of something}$ and the result can be different if You invert the order of limits and evaluate $\displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\ \lim_{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0}\ \text {of something}$. For this reason also the alternative... $\displaystyle f(\varepsilon) = \frac{1 - \sqrt{1 + 4\ \varepsilon}}{2}\ (2)$

... [supposing to consider the negative value of the square root...] should be considered and in this case is $\displaystyle \lim_{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0} f(\varepsilon) = 0$. All that in any case requires more investigation...
Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
A so called crank used this to prove that $1 = 0$ quite a few days ago in MMF : http://www.mymathforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=44831
 
DreamWeaver said:
Here's an interesting limit I found the other day...$$\text{limit}_{\, \epsilon \to 0^{+}}\sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{ \epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \cdots} } } } = 1$$It's both obvious and yet elusive... Any ideas on how to prove it...?

In order to get a correct answer to the question You have to clarify what the expression $\displaystyle f(\epsilon)= \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \sqrt{ \epsilon + \sqrt{\epsilon + \cdots} } } }$ means. In effect is $\displaystyle f(\epsilon) = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n}$ where $a_{n}$ satisfy the difference equation... $\displaystyle a_{n+1} = \sqrt{a_{n} + \epsilon},\ a_{0}= \epsilon\ (1)$

Analysing (1) You imposing the condition $\Delta_{n} = a_{n+1} - a_{n} =0$ You find that that there is an attractive fixed point in $\displaystyle x_{1} = \frac{1 + \sqrt{1 + 4\ \epsilon}}{2}$ and a repulsive fixed point in $\displaystyle x_{0} = \frac{1 - \sqrt{1 + 4\ \epsilon}}{2}$ and that means that for any $\displaystyle x_{0} < \epsilon < x_{1}$ is $\displaystyle f(\epsilon) = x_{1} = \frac{1 + \sqrt{1 + 4\ \epsilon}}{2}$ and $\displaystyle \lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} f(\epsilon)=1$, even if [and that is an important detail...] is $\displaystyle f(0)=0$... Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
I am not sure if this actually works (there might be something missing) but here goes:

[sp]Suppose $\sqrt{a + \sqrt{a + \sqrt{a + \cdots}}} = a^*$, $\sqrt{b + \sqrt{b + \sqrt{b + \cdots}}} = b^*$, and $0 < a < b$.

Then $a^* = \frac{1 + \sqrt{1 + 4a}}{2}$ and $b^* = \frac{1 + \sqrt{1 + 4b}}{2}$ therefore it follows that $a^* < b^*$.

Now suppose that $a^* < 1$. This leads to the contradiction that $\sqrt{1 + 4a} < 1$. Therefore $a^* \geq 1$, so $1 \leq a^* < b^*$.

Therefore $a^*$ goes to $1$ as $a$ goes to $0$.

$\blacksquare$[/sp]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K