An elementary analysis problem that I would like a hint on.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an elementary analysis problem concerning the existence of irrational numbers between two arbitrary real numbers. Participants explore various approaches to prove or disprove this concept, engaging with foundational principles of real analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using contradiction by assuming all numbers between two real numbers are rational. They consider specific examples like the arithmetic and geometric means, questioning their validity under certain conditions. The use of the Archimedean Principle is also mentioned as a potential avenue for constructing an irrational number.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various suggestions and lines of reasoning being explored. Some participants provide hints and alternative approaches, such as considering the density of rationals in reals and cardinality arguments, while others raise questions about specific cases and the existence of square roots.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints related to the assumptions about the numbers involved, such as the cases when one or both numbers are zero or negative, and the need to establish foundational properties like the density of rationals.

jdinatale
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
I could probably find the answer to this problem easily by a quick google search, but I don't want to spoil it. Instead, could someone give me a hint in the right direction?



rational_zpse301832c.png


Ok, so it seems to me like a contradiction would work here. It seems like directly proving the existence of an irrational between two arbitrary real numbers would be impossible.

Assuming that EVERY number between two arbitrary numbers is rational seems like a good ground for a contradiction. Now I thought of two things from here,

Consider that [itex]a < (a + b)/2 < b[/itex] and show [itex](a + b)/2[/itex] is irrational. But that won't work because a and b could be rational.

Next, I thought to consider the geometric mean [itex]a < \sqrt{ab} < b[/itex] and show that [itex]\sqrt{ab}[/itex] is irrational. But this is a problem because if one of a or b is negative, the geometric mean does not exist.

Now I only have access to bare bones tools like the fact that the real numbers is a field, the axiom of completeness, and the Archimedean Principle.

The Archimedean Principle appears useful, but I'm not sure how to cook up an irrational number using it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\sqrt{ab}## is still a good place to start. Just use ##\pm\sqrt{|a|\,|b|}## instead, with the sign selected appropriately. Now the only problems are with a=0 or b=0, and those are easy special cases.
 
Technically, you need to show that the square root exists.

Also, what if ##a=1## and ##b=4##, for example?
 
What happens if you multiply every element of the rationals by a fixed irrational? What can you say about the resulting set?
 
Did you prove that the rationals are dense in the reals yet? If not, you might want to do that first...
 
Another approach would be to use a cardinality argument. This assumes you have already established that ##\mathbb{Q}## is countable and ##\mathbb{R}## is uncountable. Given these facts, what can you say about the cardinality of the interval ##(a,b)##, and what can you conclude from that?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K