An Impossible Solution: Solving the Function Graphing Problem in Calculus Class

  • Thread starter Thread starter JPBenowitz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impossible
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the challenge of finding a continuous function f: [a,b] → R, where f(a) = f(b) and there exists no c ∈ (a, b) such that f'(c) = 0. Participants debated the validity of examples such as f(x) = 1/(1-2x) and f(x) = |x|. The consensus concluded that while f(x) = |x| is continuous, it is not differentiable at x = 0, thus satisfying the conditions of the problem. The discussion highlights the importance of differentiability and continuity in calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous functions in real analysis
  • Knowledge of differentiability and its implications
  • Familiarity with power series and their convergence
  • Basic concepts of limits in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of continuous functions and their differentiability
  • Explore the implications of the Mean Value Theorem in calculus
  • Investigate the behavior of power series and their convergence criteria
  • Learn about piecewise functions and their continuity and differentiability
USEFUL FOR

Students in calculus courses, educators teaching real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of continuous and differentiable functions.

JPBenowitz
Messages
144
Reaction score
2
So, yesterday in class we were asked to try and solve the following problem:

Given a, b \in R with a < b, draw the graph of an example of a continuous function f such that f: [a,b] \rightarrow R, f(a) = f(b), and there does not exist c \in (a, b) such that f'(c) = 0.

Now in class we arrived at the conclusion that there exists no such solution, however I beg to disagree.

Let's suppose that a = -1 and b = 1 which satisfies the inequality. Now for f(a) to = f(b) one function comes to mind, the associated power series:

f(x) = 1 + 2x + 4x2 + 8x3 + ... + 2nxn = \frac{1}{1-2x}

Such that, f2(1) = 1 and f2(-1) = 1 therefore, f(a) = f(b).

= \frac{d}{dx}(\frac{1}{1-2x})2

= (\frac{-4}{2x - 1})3

Therefore, there does not exist f'(c) = 0

If we take the limit as x \rightarrow \infty then f'(x) = 0 however there is no particular element c of (a, b) s.t. f'(c) = 0.

My question is am I right? If not where did I go horribly wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Going too fast ?
Differentiation that power series and see that at x=0
f ' (x) = 0
 
paulfr said:
Going too fast ?
Differentiation that power series and see that at x=0
f ' (x) = 0

I accidently posted before I finished lol.
 
This statement is indeed true.

I'm not sure why you're taking a limit as x goes to infinity. In any case, if you think the statement is wrong, you need to show there exists a c in (a,b) such that f'(c) = 0 for every f(x). Unfortunately, showing one example doesn't prove anything.

JPBenowitz said:
Given a, b \in R with a < b, draw the graph of an example of a continuous function f such that f: [a,b] \rightarrow R, f(a) = f(b), and there does not exist c \in (a, b) such that f'(c) = 0.

Consider the example f(x) = |x| and a = -1, b = 1. Does this satisfy the hypothesis? Is the conclusion satisfied?
 
gb7nash said:
This statement is indeed true.

I'm not sure why you're taking a limit as x goes to infinity. In any case, if you think the statement is wrong, you need to show there exists a c in (a,b) such that f'(c) = 0 for every f(x). Unfortunately, showing one example doesn't prove anything.



Consider the example f(x) = |x| and a = -1, b = 1. Does this satisfy the hypothesis? Is the conclusion satisfied?

Which statement is true? That there is no solution? Or that there is a solution?
 
This statement:

JPBenowitz said:
Given a, b \in R with a < b, draw the graph of an example of a continuous function f such that f: [a,b] \rightarrow R, f(a) = f(b), and there does not exist c \in (a, b) such that f'(c) = 0.

It is possible to construct an example of a continuous function f such that there does not exist a c \in (a,b) such that f'(c) = 0. Consider f(x) = |x|.
 
gb7nash said:
This statement:



It is possible to construct an example of a continuous function f such that there does not exist a c \in (a,b) such that f'(c) = 0. Consider f(x) = |x|.

f(x) is discontinuous at 0.
 
JPBenowitz said:
f(x) is discontinuous at 0.

f(x) = |x| is continuous at x=0. However, it isn't differentiable at x=0.
 
gb7nash said:
f(x) = |x| is continuous at x=0. However, it isn't differentiable at x=0.

Sorry, that's what I meant.
 
  • #10
In your OP, f(x) = 1/(1-2x) is not continuous (in fact it is not even defined) when x = 1/2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K