An infinite sum of the Heaviside function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the infinite sum of the Heaviside function, specifically the unit stair-case function defined as f(t) = n for n-1 ≤ t < n. It concludes that the sum f(t) = ∑_{n=0}^{∞} u(t-n) is valid for all t ≥ 0, but for each finite t, only finitely many terms contribute to the sum, as u(t-n) becomes zero for n > t. This clarifies that while the sum is infinite, it does not yield an infinite result for any specific finite t due to the nature of the Heaviside function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Heaviside step function (u(t))
  • Familiarity with infinite series and summation notation
  • Basic knowledge of piecewise functions
  • Concept of Laplace Transforms and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Heaviside function in detail
  • Learn about convergence of infinite series in mathematical analysis
  • Explore the application of Laplace Transforms in solving differential equations
  • Investigate the relationship between piecewise functions and their graphical representations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus, differential equations, and Laplace Transforms, as well as anyone interested in the applications of the Heaviside function in engineering and physics.

kostoglotov
Messages
231
Reaction score
6
I'm not sure where to put this question. It is by itself pretty basic, but it's a preamble to a Laplace Transform exercise, and I'll probably want to ask some follow up questions once the current query is resolved.

1. Homework Statement


Unit stair-case function: f(t) = n, \ if \ \ n-1 \leq t &lt; n, \ \ n = 1,2,3,...

Show that f(t) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} u(t-n) \ for all t \geq 0

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I can see how as we move through the values of n, each unit step function will just be adding one, which just builds the stair-case, but after any given t is reached, won't that sum just keeping adding an infinite number of 1's to result?

Does the sum to infinity actually stop at some finite point because n-1 \leq t &lt; n, \ \ n = 1,2,3,...? Wouldn't that contradict the idea of having an infinite sum?

Or does the unit step function used in the sum drop down to zero after a certain n is reached? How would that work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The unit step function is zero if its argument is negative, and t - n will eventually become negative for sufficiently large n.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kostoglotov
kostoglotov said:
I'm not sure where to put this question. It is by itself pretty basic, but it's a preamble to a Laplace Transform exercise, and I'll probably want to ask some follow up questions once the current query is resolved.

1. Homework Statement


Unit stair-case function: f(t) = n, \ if \ \ n-1 \leq t &lt; n, \ \ n = 1,2,3,...

Show that f(t) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} u(t-n) \ for all t \geq 0

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I can see how as we move through the values of n, each unit step function will just be adding one, which just builds the stair-case, but after any given t is reached, won't that sum just keeping adding an infinite number of 1's to result?

Does the sum to infinity actually stop at some finite point because n-1 \leq t &lt; n, \ \ n = 1,2,3,...? Wouldn't that contradict the idea of having an infinite sum?

Or does the unit step function used in the sum drop down to zero after a certain n is reached? How would that work?

For each finite ##t## there will be only finitely many nonzero terms in the sum. For ##n > t## all the ##u(t-n)## are zero.

You cannot write the result for ALL ##t## as a single finite sum, since different ##t## need different numbers of terms.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
991