Analogue of the S.E. for photons?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TriKri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the wave equation that describes the motion of light, specifically seeking an analogue to the Schrödinger equation for photons. Participants explore how light behaves in diffractive materials and the implications for different frequencies traveling at varying speeds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks what wave equation describes the motion of light and how to demonstrate that light travels at different speeds for different frequencies in diffractive materials.
  • Another participant suggests the Maxwell equations as a potential framework.
  • A different viewpoint notes that while the electromagnetic wave equation indicates all frequencies travel at the same speed, this does not hold true in all media.
  • One participant introduces the concept of using tensors for permittivity and permeability, indicating that these become field-strength dependent in matter.
  • Another participant questions how this framework explains the varying speeds of light in different media and frequencies.
  • A response highlights that the non-linearity of the Maxwell equations in media, due to the dependence on E and B, complicates the solutions compared to vacuum conditions.
  • One participant argues that the different speeds of light can occur even in systems with a linear dependence of D on E, suggesting non-linearity is not the primary factor.
  • A question is raised about the practical forms of ε and μ as functions of frequency or wavelength, seeking a more concrete understanding.
  • Another participant proposes writing permeability and permittivity as functions of D(E) and discusses the implications for Fourier transformed fields, mentioning the Lindhard dielectric function as a reference for approximate analytical expressions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the Maxwell equations and the role of non-linearity in explaining the behavior of light in various media. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the relationships between electric and magnetic fields and their dependence on material properties, but do not reach a consensus on the implications for light speed in different media.

TriKri
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Hello! What wave equation describes the motion of light? And how do you show that light will necessarily get different speeds for different frequencies in diffractive materials? This would be the analogue of the Schrödinger equation for photons.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe the Maxwell equations?
 
I mean, there is the electromagnetic wave equation, but according to that all frequencies travel with the same speed, which is clearly not the case for all medias.
 
You can include matter using the tensors for permittivity and permeability ε = ε(E,B) and μ = μ(E,B) and writing
D = εE for the displacement and
H = B/μ for the magnetization

Formally the Maxwell equations look the same using D and H, but you should keep in mind that in matter ε and μ become field-strength dependent tensors.
 
How can that explain that light doesn't always travel with the same speed in all medias and for all frequencies?
 
Because the Maxwell equations in media are non-linear in E and B due to ε = ε(E,B) and μ = μ(E,B). That means that the (originally) linear differential equations become non-linear which prevents us from solving them with a simple ansatz in x-ct and x+ct as is the case for the equations in vacuum
 
But the different speed of light already happens for systems with a linear dependence of D on E. So it's not primarily a question of non-linearity.
 
You say that you can write ε and μ as functions, ε(E,B) and μ(E,B); what do they look like in reality? Or maybe even better, how can you write ε and μ as functions of the frequency or the wavelength? Then you can derive ε and μ as functions of E and B from those.
 
I wouldn't write permeability and permittivity as functions of E and B but rather D(E). In the optical region, one usually choses H=B, so mu=1. The dependence of
Then, at least in homogeneous media, one can write for the Fourier transformed fields:
[tex]D(\omega,k)=\epsilon(\omega,k) E(\omega,k)+[/tex] terms quadratic (and higher orders) in E.
Note that epsilon is a tensor. The terms of higher order are responsible for the effects of non-linear optics like frequency doubling etc.
Approximate analytical expressions for epsilon exist e.g. for a homogeneous gas of electrons. Look for Lindhard dielectric function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
7K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K