Analysing short period oscillations of an aircraft

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on analyzing short period oscillations (SPO) of an aircraft under varying flight conditions. Two methods were employed: a calculation-based approach using the formula T = 2π/undamped natural frequency, and a graphical analysis of SPO through time history graphs. It was concluded that while calculations provide precise values, graphical analysis is essential for understanding dynamic behaviors such as damping and oscillation persistence, which are not captured by single-point calculations. The importance of interpreting time history graphs in flight control design is emphasized, particularly when dealing with rapid changes in flight conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of aircraft dynamics and oscillation principles
  • Familiarity with the formula T = 2π/undamped natural frequency
  • Experience in analyzing time history graphs and strip charts
  • Knowledge of flight control design and its requirements
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced techniques in flight dynamics modeling
  • Explore the use of MATLAB for simulating aircraft oscillations
  • Learn about non-linear dynamics in flight testing
  • Investigate methods for improving accuracy in graphical data analysis
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, flight control designers, and students studying aircraft dynamics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the comparative analysis of calculation versus graphical methods in understanding aircraft behavior.

MattH150197
Messages
60
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Recently did a lab experiment were 3 different flight conditions were applied to the same aircraft to see how it affected the aircraft dynamics, we analysed the results by two different methods 1.) calculate using the flight coniditons with a formula sheet and 2.) we printed out the graphs of the SPO for each condition and analysed the graph to produce results. As part of the report we got asked to compare the accuracy of the two methods, I am just wondering is there any certain situations where graphical analysis would be used because surely it is more inaccurate than calculations but seen as we got asked to compare the accuracy I am guessing there is some use for it.

Homework Equations


Example for the time period by method 1: T = 2pi/undamped natural frequency where the frequency is calculated by a calculation involving the velocity, pitching moment and pitch inertia which are all parameters for the flight conditions
Method 2: of course using a ruler the time between two peaks of the graph
Thanks for any suggestions you can offer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Flight control design involves many hours of looking at strip charts showing the time history of a maneuver. Remember that the flight condition can change rapidly, so the exact values at one instant do not tell you as much as you need. You need to be able to look at a time history graph to see if the plane oscillations damp out quickly, grow exponentially, or persist for too long. Exact values at one instant, at one flight condition, do not really tell the story. So it is important to be able to interpret the time history graphs on strip charts.

PS. Also, often the linear solution is not as accurate as you want. A large simulation or actual flight test data can be different from the linear solution answer. In that case, reading the strip chart of the data is necessary.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MattH150197 and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
754
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
666
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K