Analysis of "X = (xn) Sequence of Strictly Positive Real Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter buzzmath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the sequence X = (xn) of strictly positive real numbers, where the limit of the ratio lim(x(n+1)/xn) is less than 1, indicating that the sequence converges to zero. A method is proposed to choose a value r between 0 and 1, leading to the conclusion that there exists a constant C such that 0 < xn < Cr^n for sufficiently large n. The approach involves establishing an inequality through induction, starting from the relationship xn+1 < r * xn. The participants are working towards proving that the sequence behaves as expected under the defined conditions. Ultimately, the goal is to demonstrate that lim(xn) equals 0.
buzzmath
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
X = (xn) is a sequence of strictly positive real numbers, where (xn) is x subscript n, such that lim(x(n+1)/xn) < 1. Show that for some r with 0<r<1 and some C>0 that 0<xn<Cr^n for all sufficiently large natural numbers n. and that lim(xn) = 0

So for I have this:
choose r such that lim(x(n+1)/xn)<r<1 and take a neighborhood of this limit to be the interval (-1,r) So there exists a natural number K such that 0<x(n+1)/xn<r for all n>=K. I can also write r = 1/(1+a) where a>0 and show that lim(r^n)=0. All I need to show now is that xn<Cr^n. Because I know that if lim(r^n)=0 and ||xn - 0||<=C|r^n| where C>0 then lim(r^n)=0. I'm not really sure how to get the xn<Cr^n though. Any help or suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've shown xn+1/xn<r for n>=K. You can rewrite this as xn+1<r*xn. Apply induction to get an inequality involving xk+n and xk.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
950
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K