Analysis Problem: Find Solution in 1 Week

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dragonfall
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding interesting analysis problems suitable for a week-long exploration, focusing on topics up to Lebesgue integration. Participants propose various problems, some theoretical and others more computational, while also discussing related concepts in measure theory and integration.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests a problem involving the sigma-algebras generated by various subsets of real numbers, asking to show their equivalence.
  • Another participant proposes a limit involving an integral and a series, indicating it can be approached with analysis techniques.
  • A different participant expresses a preference for more theoretical problems, seeking depth rather than repetitive calculations.
  • One participant introduces a measure space scenario with subsets and asks about the relationships between specific sets defined by their membership criteria.
  • Another participant requests an example of a ring of subsets that does not qualify as a sigma-ring.
  • A participant presents a problem regarding the Riemann integrability of a bounded function with a finite number of discontinuities, inviting others to compare proofs.
  • Another participant comments on the condition for Riemann integrability, stating it holds when discontinuities form a set of measure zero.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying preferences for problem types, with some favoring theoretical challenges while others suggest more computational tasks. There is no consensus on a single problem to pursue, and discussions about the properties of functions and sets remain open-ended.

Contextual Notes

Some problems involve assumptions about measure spaces and properties of functions that may not be universally agreed upon. The discussions reflect differing levels of complexity and theoretical depth, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their proposed solutions.

Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
I'm looking for a good analysis problem (solved or otherwise) that will keep me busy for, say, a week. Anything up to Lebesgue integration is ok.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not a very interesting problem, but it will require a bit of paper.

Consider the following 11 subsets of the real numbers (let a and b be any real number):

[tex]E_1 = \{(a,b)\}[/tex]
[tex]E_2 = \{[a,b)\}[/tex]
[tex]E_3 = \{(a,b]\}[/tex]
[tex]E_4 = \{[a,b]\}[/tex]
[tex]E_5 = \{(a,\infty)\}[/tex]
[tex]E_6 = \{[a,\infty)\}[/tex]
[tex]E_7 = \{(-\infty,b)\}[/tex]
[tex]E_8 = \{(-\infty,b]\}[/tex]
[tex]E_9 = \{all open sets\}[/tex]
[tex]E_1_0 = \{all closed sets\}[/tex]
[tex]E_1_1 = \{all compact sets\}[/tex]

Show that the sigma-algebras generated by each of these sets is the same (that is, that they are all subsets of each other).
 
Last edited:
Here's another one I like. Technically it's a calculus question, but you can make it Analysis by justifying each of the steps involved. You'll need at least one major theorem.

[tex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-2x} \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{x^k}{k!} dx[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Thanks, but I was thinking something a little more theoretical and less repetitive.
 
Suppose [tex](X, M, \mu)[/tex] is a measure space. Suppose [tex]A_1, A_2,[/tex]... are subsets of X. Let:

[tex]A = \{ x \in X \mid x \in A_n[/tex] for all but finitely many [tex]n \geq 1 \}[/tex],

[tex]B = \{ x \in X \mid x \in A_n[/tex] for infinitely many [tex]n \geq 1\}[/tex].

Question 1: Which, if any, of the following are equal to A or B?

(a) [tex]\bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} \bigcap_{n=k}^{\infty} A_n[/tex]

(b) [tex]\bigcap_{k=1}^{\infty} \bigcup_{n=k}^{\infty} A_n[/tex]Question 2: Further suppose that [tex]A_1, A_2, ... \in M[/tex] and

[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \mu(A_n) < \infty[/tex]

Prove that [tex]\mu(B) = 0[/tex].
 
Last edited:
Give an example of a ring of subsets of a set X that is not a sigma-ring.
 
Suppose f:[a,b]->R is bounded and continuous except a finite number of points z_1, ..., z_k. Prove f:[a,b]->R is riemann integrable. (I believe this is also true if f is continuous except at a countable number of points)

I'm not sure my proof is correct but I'd love to see yours if you come up with one so we can compare.
 
Actually, it is true exactly when the discontinuities form a set of measure zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K