Analysis: Prove f(u+v)=f(u)+f(v) implies f(x)=f(1)x

  • Thread starter Thread starter pcvt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a functional equation for a function f: R->R, specifically that f(u+v) = f(u) + f(v) implies f(x) = f(1)x for all rational x, and subsequently for all real x under continuity conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss proving the property for rational numbers after establishing it for natural numbers. They explore the implications of the functional equation and consider using induction and properties of numbers.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress in proving the property for specific cases, such as natural numbers and fractions. There is ongoing exploration of how to combine results for different sets of numbers, including integers and negative values. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of induction and properties of additive identities.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the proof under the constraints of the functional equation and the need to address various types of numbers, including rationals and negatives, without having a complete method established for all cases yet.

pcvt
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that a function f R->R has the property that f(u+v) = f(u)+f(v). Prove that f(x)=f(1)x for all rational x. Then, show that if f(x) is continuous that f(x)=f(1)x for all real x.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've proved that f(x)=f(1)x for all natural x by breaking up x into f(1)+f(x-1) and using induction, but I can't figure out how to do it for all rationals.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is

[itex]f(1/n)+...+f(1/n)[/itex]

? (if you take n sums)
 
f(1)=f(1/2+1/2)=f(1/2)+f(1/2), right? That means f(1/2)=f(1)*(1/2). Can you show f(1)=f(1/3+1/3+1/3)=f(1/3)+f(1/3)+f(1/3)? How about using induction to show f(1/n)=f(1)*(1/n)??
 
Ok, I see that I can show it for f(1/n). How can I combine the two though, since I don't have a rule to say f(m/n)=f(1)*(m/n)? Also, how can I include negative numbers?

Thanks!
 
I would be inclined to look at the basic "sets of numbers" and use their defining properties. For example, the "natural numbers" or "counting numbers" are defined by "induction"- 1 is a natural number and, if n is a natural number, then n+ 1 is also. Obviously, for any number, x, f(x)= f(x)(1). Use induction to show that for any positive integer, n, then f(n)= f(x)n and then take x= 1. (You will use the general "x" below.)

The "whole numbers" are just the positive integers together with 0. And 0 is the "additive identity", for any positive integer, n, n+ 0= n. Look at f(n+ 0)= f(n)+ f(0).

The "integers" includes the negative integers: we now have additive inverse. Any negative integer is of the form -n for some positive integer n. f(n+ (-n))= f(n)+ f(-n) and, of course, f(n+(-n))= f(0).

Finally, look at numbers of the form 1/n, n non-zero. Obviously, n(1/n)= 1 so f(n(1/n))= f(1). But you have already shown that f(nx)= f(x)n. So take x= 1/n.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I would be inclined to look at the basic "sets of numbers" and use their defining properties. For example, the "natural numbers" or "counting numbers" are defined by "induction"- 1 is a natural number and, if n is a natural number, then n+ 1 is also. Obviously, for any number, x, f(x)= f(x)(1). Use induction to show that for any positive integer, n, then f(n)= f(x)n and then take x= 1. (You will use the general "x" below.)

The "whole numbers" are just the positive integers together with 0. And 0 is the "additive identity", for any positive integer, n, n+ 0= n. Look at f(n+ 0)= f(n)+ f(0).

The "integers" includes the negative integers: we now have additive inverse. Any negative integer is of the form -n for some positive integer n. f(n+ (-n))= f(n)+ f(-n) and, of course, f(n+(-n))= f(0).

Finally, look at numbers of the form 1/n, n non-zero. Obviously, n(1/n)= 1 so f(n(1/n))= f(1). But you have already shown that f(nx)= f(x)n. So take x= 1/n.


So helpful, got it from there. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K