Analysis - Upper and Lower Bounds

  • Thread starter Thread starter teme92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Bounds
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the definitions of upper and lower bounds in the context of real analysis. An upper bound for a non-empty subset E of real numbers R is defined as a value y such that every element x in E satisfies x ≤ y. The least upper bound, or supremum, is the smallest upper bound of E, meaning that if any other upper bound y1 exists, it must be greater than or equal to the least upper bound. The conversation highlights the importance of precise definitions and the correct interpretation of mathematical notation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real numbers and subsets
  • Familiarity with the concepts of upper and lower bounds
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical notation and set theory
  • Introduction to real analysis principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of supremum and infimum in real analysis
  • Learn about the completeness property of real numbers
  • Explore examples of upper and lower bounds in various sets
  • Review definitions and properties of intervals in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of bounds in mathematical sets.

teme92
Messages
185
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Let E be a non-empty subset of the real numbers R. De fine carefully each of the terms
(i) 'y is an upper bound for E' and (ii) 'y is the least upper bound for E'

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I've just started doing analysis and I'm unsure how I'm supposed to answer this. As its a definition I can't come up with any solution. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks everyone :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
teme92 said:

Homework Statement



Let E be a non-empty subset of the real numbers R. De fine carefully each of the terms
(i) 'y is an upper bound for E' and (ii) 'y is the least upper bound for E'

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I've just started doing analysis and I'm unsure how I'm supposed to answer this. As its a definition I can't come up with any solution. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks everyone :smile:

You will have go struggle with it---we are not allowed to answer for you. Are you using a textbook? Do you have course notes? Are you claiming that those sources contain nothing on the relevant topics?
 
Hi Ray,

I understand what upper and lower bounds are its just the phrasing of the question that's confusing me. Can I say:

E={x ε R: x≥n & x≤m, n,m εR}

Y is upper bound if y≥n
Y is lower bound if y≤m

Thanks for the quick response and appreciate any further help.
 
teme92 said:
Hi Ray,

I understand what upper and lower bounds are its just the phrasing of the question that's confusing me. Can I say:

E={x ε R: x≥n & x≤m, n,m εR}

Y is upper bound if y≥n
Y is lower bound if y≤m

Thanks for the quick response and appreciate any further help.

No, you have it backwards. The way you have written E, it must be the interval [n,m], but that was not given in the question. All you know is that ##E \subset \mathbb{R}##. For example, E could be all the real numbers of the form ##1-1/n, n = 1,2, \ldots##, and these certainly do not form an interval.

In the lines below, where you say "Y is upper bound if y≥n" etc, you do not say what is n.
 
So do I just say:

i) yεF is an upper bound for E if x≤y whenever xεE

ii) yεF is a least upper bound if y is an upper bound for E and if y1εF and y1≤y then y1 is not an upper bound for E
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K