Analytic function, creation and annihilation operators proof

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the relation f(a†a)a† = a†f(a†a + 1) for an analytic function f, using the commutation relation [a, a†] = 1. The user attempts to manipulate the expression but struggles with applying the properties of analytic functions and power series. They recognize that both sides of the equation involve series of powers of a†a and aa†, which can be shown to be equivalent through multiplication by a†. Additionally, the user seeks to connect this result to the expectation value of n in a bosonic system, questioning how to apply the initial proof to derive the Bose-Einstein distribution. The conversation highlights the challenges in linking algebraic manipulations to physical interpretations in quantum mechanics.
vst98
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that

f(aa)a = af(aa + 1)

Where f is any analytic function and a and a† satisfy commutation relation [a, a] = 1.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have used [a, a†] = aa†-a†a=1 to write the expression like

f(a†a)a†= a†f(aa†)

but I don't know what to do next.

I know that analytic function can be written like f(x)=Ʃ kn(x-x0)2 and that it is infinitely differentiable, but I don't see how can I sucesssfuly
apply this, or there some other trick here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So f is essentially a power series and you can then use induction for an arbitrary power of (a+ a)
 
I think now I understand,
so on the left hand side for f(a†a) I will have powers of a†a
like a†a + a†aa†a ...
and on the right hand side for f(aa†) i will have powers of aa†
like aa† + aa†aa† ...

but since I have to multiply these series by a† from the opposite sides
(a†a + a†aa†a ... ) /a† = a†aa† + a†aa†aa† ...
a†\ ( aa† + aa†aa† ... ) = a†aa† + a†aa†aa† ...

they turn out to be the same, right ?
 
also I have a question which builds on this one (so I will stay in this thread),
A bosonic one level system can be described by the Hamiltonian
H= εa†a,

The expectation value of n = a†a is defined as n(ε) = <n> = tr(ρa†a) where

ρ=(1/ZG)*Exp[-β(ε-μ)a†a] , tr(ρ)=1

is the grand canonical density matrix.
Use f(a†a)a† = a†f(a†a + 1) to show that the form

n(ε) = 1/(Exp[β(ε-μ)]

of the Bose-Einstein distribution directly follows from the bosonic commutation
relation for a and a†.

I don't see where to apply my result from the first part, to trace function maybe ?
But that does not have appropriate form.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
603
Replies
0
Views
787
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K