Analytic functions of analytic functions

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physgeek64
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the property of analytic functions, specifically whether an analytic function of an analytic function remains analytic. Participants explore definitions, potential proofs, and the implications of these properties in the context of complex analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the statement that an analytic function of an analytic function is itself analytic is a fact or requires proof, expressing uncertainty about the sufficiency of the derivative relationship provided.
  • Another participant prompts a discussion on the definitions of analytic functions, suggesting two possible definitions and indicating that the differentiation condition may suffice under one definition, while also noting the need to show the equivalence of the definitions.
  • A third participant shares a link to additional resources that may clarify the topic further, specifically mentioning that complex functions may simplify the analysis.
  • A later reply proposes a method to prove the statement by constructing power series for the functions involved and suggests using epsilon-delta arguments to establish convergence, while acknowledging the challenges in this approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the proof of the statement regarding analytic functions. There are multiple viewpoints on definitions and approaches to proving the property, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on definitions of analytic functions and the challenges in proving the property through power series and convergence arguments. Some assumptions about the behavior of the functions and their derivatives are also implied but not explicitly stated.

Physgeek64
Messages
245
Reaction score
11
In our complex variables course we were told that an analytic function of an analytic function is itself analytic. i.e. For ##h(z)=g(f(z))## ##h(z)## is analytic.

I was wondering is this is just a fact, or if it is possible to prove this statement. I did some googling and the best response I could find was :

##h'(z)= g'(f(z)) f'(z)##, which for ##f'(z)## and ##g'(f(z))## not equal to zero, describes an analytic function.. But I'm afraid this doesn't seem like much of a proof to me.

Many thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your definition of an analytic function? Is it
"We say that the function ##f## is analytic in a neighbourhood ##U## of ##z_0## if it is differentiable everywhere in ##U##." (http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~jmf/Teaching/MT3/ComplexAnalysis.pdf)
or is it
"In mathematics, an analytic function is a function that is locally given by a convergent power series."
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_function)

For the first one the differentiation you mentioned would be enough (plus that ##g(U)## is open).
Then it remains to show that the two definitions are equivalent. (See chapter 2.3.3 in the first source I mentioned.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
I suggest attempting to prove it as follows.

Choose an arbitrary point ##z## and a point ##z'## sufficiently close to ##z## that the power series ##\Big(S^{f,z}_n(z')\Big)_{n=1}^\infty## for ##f(z')## at ##z## converges to ##f(z')## and the power series ##\Big(S^{g,f(z)}_n(z')\Big)_{n=1}^\infty## for ##g(f(z'))## at ##f(z)## converges to ##g(f(z'))##. We know this can be done by the definition of analyticity of the two functions.

Then take the power series for ##g(f(z'))## and replace all occurrences of ##f(z')## by the power series for ##f(z')##. If we write ##\Delta z'\equiv z'-z## then this gives us an infinite series whose terms are powers of an infinite series in ##\Delta z'##. By adding coefficients across the same powers of ##\Delta z'## we can find the coefficient of each power of ##\Delta z'## in the power series that is our candidate for the actual power series for ##h##. Write out the coefficients for the first few powers and a pattern should emerge that will allow writing a formula for the coefficient of ##(\Delta z')^n##. We now have a power series that we would hope will converge to ##h(z')## for ##z'## sufficiently close to ##z##.

Now we need to use epsilon-delta arguments to show that there is some ##r## such that for ##|z'-z|<r##, the power series for ##g(f(z'))## does converge and is equal to ##g(f(z'))##.

Both parts have their challenges, but it's an interesting yet eminently doable problem and should be enjoyable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K