Analytic is UHP to unit disc

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disc Unit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analytic isomorphism of the open upper half plane, $\mathcal{H}$, onto the open unit disc. Participants explore the form of such isomorphisms, the conditions under which they hold, and the implications of various mathematical transformations and compositions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a general form for the analytic isomorphism as $$T(z) = e^{i\varphi}\frac{z - a}{z - \bar{z}}$$ and seeks guidance on its derivation.
  • Another participant questions the denominator, suggesting it should be $\overline{z}-a$ instead, and later corrects this to $z-\bar{a}$, emphasizing the need for analyticity.
  • A different participant introduces a function $f(z) = \dfrac{z - a}{z - \bar{a}}$ and discusses its properties, asserting it maps $\mathcal{H}$ into the unit disc.
  • Concerns are raised about the role of the factor $e^{i\varphi}$, with participants debating when it should be included in the proof process.
  • Another participant describes the composition of two functions, $\psi$ and $\varphi$, and seeks clarification on how the resulting expression simplifies to the proposed form.
  • Further elaboration on the mapping properties of the functions involved is provided, including details on the transformation of points and the preservation of the unit circle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct form of the isomorphism and the role of specific terms within it. There is no consensus on the final expression or the steps leading to it, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of maintaining analyticity in the proposed transformations and the implications of various assumptions about the parameters involved. The discussion reflects uncertainties regarding the correct forms and the relationships between the functions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying complex analysis, particularly in the context of conformal mappings and analytic functions, as well as individuals exploring the properties of transformations between different domains in the complex plane.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Prove that the most general analytic isomorphism of the open upper half plane, $\mathcal{H}$, onto the open unit disc is of the form
$$
T(z) = e^{i\varphi}\frac{z - a}{z - \bar{z}}
$$
for some $\varphi\in\mathbb{R}$ and some $a\in\mathbb{C}$ with $\text{Im}(a) > 0$

I need some guidance here. Opalg keeps suggestion to multiple by the conjugate so as a stab in the dark should I multiple by the conjugate here as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
Prove that the most general analytic isomorphism of the open upper half plane, $\mathcal{H}$, onto the open unit disc is of the form
$$
T(z) = e^{i\varphi}\frac{z - a}{z - \bar{z}}
$$
for some $\varphi\in\mathbb{R}$ and some $a\in\mathbb{C}$ with $\text{Im}(a) > 0$

I need some guidance here. Opalg keeps suggestion to multiple by the conjugate so as a stab in the dark should I multiple by the conjugate here as well?

Are you sure that shouldn't be $\overline{z}-a$ in the denominator?
 
Tinyboss said:
Are you sure that shouldn't be $\overline{z}-a$ in the denominator?
It should be $z-\bar{a}$. (If $T(z)$ has any $\bar{z}$s then it won't be analytic.)
 
Yes it was supposed to be \bar{z}. How should I proceed then?
 
dwsmith said:
Yes it was supposed to be \bar{z}. How should I proceed then?

I meant \bar{a} sorry.
 
Given an analytic isomorphism $T(z)$ of $\mathcal{H}$ onto the open unit disc, let $a = T^{-1}(0)$, and define $f(z) = \dfrac{z - a}{z - \bar{a}}$. Notice that any point $z\in \mathcal{H}$ is closer to $a$ than it is to $\bar{a}$, and therefore $f$ maps $\mathcal{H}$ into the open unit disc (and in fact you should show that $f$ maps $\mathcal{H}$ onto the open unit disc). Thus $f(z)$ is an analytic isomorphism from $\mathcal{H}$ onto the open unit disc. Therefore the map $x\mapsto f(H^{-1}(z))$ is an analytic isomorphism from the open unit disc onto itself that fixes the point 0. Now use Schwarz's lemma.
 
Why have we disregarded $e^{i\varphi}$?
 
dwsmith said:
Why have we disregarded $e^{i\varphi}$?
That comes in at the end of the proof, when you apply Schwarz's lemma.
 
I know that $\psi:\mathcal{H}\to\mathbb{D}$ by $\psi(z):\dfrac{z-i}{z+i}$ maps the upper half plane into the unit disc.

The analytic isomorphism of $\varphi:\mathbb{D}\to\mathbb{D}$ are $\varphi(z)=e^{i\theta}\dfrac{a-z}{1-\bar{a}z}$.

By function composition $\psi\circ\varphi$, I obatin
$$
e^{i\theta}\frac{a(z+i)-(z-i)}{z+i-\bar{a}(z-i)}.
$$

How does this simplify down to
$$
e^{i\theta}\frac{z-a}{z-\bar{a}}
$$
though?

I know that the composition is supposed to yield the correct result but no matter the order, I can't get it.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Let $f:\mathcal{H}\to\mathbb{D}$ by $f(z) = \dfrac{z - i}{z + i}$.
By Lang (p. 215), we see that $f$ maps the upper half plane into the unit disc.
Let $g:\mathbb{D}\to\mathbb{D}$ by $g(z) = e^{i\theta}\dfrac{z - a}{\bar{a}z - 1}$.
Then
$$
(g\circ f)(z) = e^{i\theta}\frac{z(1 - a) - i(1 + a)}{z(\bar{a} - 1) - i(\bar{a} + 1)} = e^{i\theta}\left(\frac{1 - a}{\bar{a} - 1}\right)\frac{z - i \left(\frac{1 + a}{1 - a}\right)}{z - i \left(\frac{\bar{a} + 1}{\bar{a} - 1}\right)}.
$$
So let $\alpha = i\dfrac{1 + a}{1 - a}$.
Then $\overline{\alpha} = i\dfrac{1 + \bar{a}}{\bar{a} - 1}$.
Thus
$$
(g\circ f)(z) = e^{i\theta}\left(\frac{1 - a}{\bar{a} - 1}\right)\frac{z - \alpha}{z - \overline{\alpha}}.
$$
Since $\left|e^{i\theta}\left(\dfrac{1 - a}{\bar{a} - 1}\right)\right| = 1$, this expression lies on the unit circle and can be written as $e^{i\varphi}$.
So
$$
(g\circ f)(z) = e^{i\varphi}\frac{z - \alpha}{z - \overline{\alpha}} = T(z).
$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K