Analyze Stability of Mathieu's Equation w/ Perturbation Method

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on analyzing the stability of Mathieu's equation using perturbation methods, specifically near the values of $\delta = 1$ and $\delta = 4$ when $\epsilon$ is small. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and implications of the perturbation approach in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the equation and asks how to apply the perturbation method to analyze stability near $\delta = 1$ and $\delta = 4$.
  • Another participant suggests setting $\epsilon = 0$ to simplify the analysis and derives a solution for $u(t)$ under this assumption.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of the derived solution for stability, particularly when $\epsilon = 0$ and the period of the solution.
  • Further expansions of the perturbation series are discussed, with participants deriving equations for $u_0$ and $u_1$ and exploring the implications of resonance suppression.
  • One participant questions the value of $\delta_2$ when analyzing the case for $\delta = 4$, leading to further exploration of the equations governing $u_1$ and $u_2$.
  • Discussions include the periodicity of solutions and the conditions under which stability can be assessed, particularly in relation to Floquet theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of setting $\epsilon = 0$ and the resulting stability analysis. There is no consensus on the value of $\delta_2$ or the overall stability conclusions for the cases discussed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion contains unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the perturbation method and the periodicity of solutions. The dependence on the smallness of $\epsilon$ and the implications of resonance are also noted but not fully resolved.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
For Mathieu's equation
$$
u'' + (\delta + \epsilon\cos 2t)u = 0,
$$
use the perturbation method to analytically determine its stability near $\delta = 1$ and $\delta = 4$ when $\epsilon\ll 1$.

How would I do this using a perturbation method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
For Mathieu's equation
$$
u'' + (\delta + \epsilon\cos 2t)u = 0,
$$
use the perturbation method to analytically determine its stability near $\delta = 1$ and $\delta = 4$ when $\epsilon\ll 1$.

How would I do this using a perturbation method?

If we take $\delta = 1$, we have $u'' + (1 + \epsilon\cos 2t)u = 0$. I need to find a $u(t) = u_1(t) + u_2(t)$ such that it satisfies $u_1(t) = 1$, $u_1'(t) = 0$, $u_2(t) = 0$, $u_2'(t) = 1$ and $u$ satisfies $u'' + (1 + \epsilon\cos 2t)u = 0$. Since $\epsilon\ll 1$, can we make $\epsilon = 0$? Because if that was the case, then $u = A\cos t\sqrt{\delta} + B\sin t\sqrt{\delta}$.
 
Am I on the right track and what does this tell me about its stability?

When $\epsilon = 0$, we have $\ddot{u} + \delta u = 0$.
Given that for these two cases $\delta > 0$, $u(t) = A\cos t\sqrt{\delta} + B\sin t\sqrt{\delta}$ which satisfies $u_1(0) = 1$, $\dot{u}_1(0) = 0$, $u_2(0) = 0$, and $\dot{u}_2(0) = 1$ when $u_1 = A\cos t\sqrt{\delta}$ and $u_2 = B\sin t\sqrt{\delta}$.
The period has to be the same as Mathieu's equation of $\pi$.
So then we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\phi & = & \frac{1}{2}\left[u_1(T) + \dot{u}_2(T)\right]\\
& = & \frac{1}{2}\left[\cos \pi\sqrt{\delta} + \cos pi\sqrt{\delta}\right]\\
& = & \cos \pi\sqrt{\delta}
\end{alignat*}
For $\delta = 1$, we have $\phi = -1$.
Then $\left.\phi\right|_{\epsilon = 0} = -1$.
By Floquet, at -1, we need a period of $2T$.
$\epsilon\cos 2t$ admits a $2\pi$ periodic solution.
Taking the Taylor series expansion, we obtain
\begin{alignat}{5}
u(t,\epsilon) & = & u_0(t) + \epsilon u_1(t) + \epsilon^2\frac{u_2(t)}{2} + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^3) & = & 0\notag\\
& = & (\ddot{u}_0 + \epsilon \ddot{u}_1) + [\delta + \epsilon\cos 2t](u_0 + \epsilon u_1 +\cdots) & = & 0\\
& = & (\ddot{u}_0 + \epsilon \ddot{u}_1) + \delta u_0 + \epsilon\delta u_1 + \epsilon\cos (2t) u_0 + \cdots & = & 0\notag\\
& = & (u_0 + \delta u_0) + \epsilon(\ddot{u}_1 + \delta u_1 + \cos (2t) u_0) + \cdots & = & 0\notag
\end{alignat}
We would need
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\ddot{u}_0 + \delta u_0 & = & 0\\
\ddot{u}_1 + \delta u_1 & = & -\cos (2t)u_0
\end{alignat*}
Now, let's expand $\delta$ by its Taylor series.
$$
\delta(\epsilon) = \underbrace{\delta_0}_{= 1} + \epsilon\delta_1 + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2)
$$
So $\delta$ can be expand in (1).
\begin{alignat*}{3}
(\ddot{u}_0 + \epsilon \ddot{u}_1 + \mathcal{\epsilon^2}) + [(\delta_0 + \epsilon\delta_1 + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2)) + \epsilon\cos 2t](u_0 + \epsilon u_1 +\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2)] & = & 0\\
(\ddot{u}_0 + \delta_0 u_0) + \epsilon(\ddot{u}_1 + \delta_0 u_1 + \cos (2t)u_0 + \delta_1 u_0) + \cdots & = & 0
\end{alignat*}
Since $\delta_0 = 1$, we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\ddot{u}_0 + u_0 & = & 0\\
\ddot{u}_1 + u_1 & = & -\cos (2t)u_0 - \delta_1 u_0\\
\vdots & & \vdots
\end{alignat*}
$u_0 = c_1\cos t + c_2\sin t$ which is $2\pi$ periodic and this satisfies $\ddot{u}_0 + u_0 = 0$.
Then $\ddot{u}_1 + u_1 = -\cos (2t)[c_1\cos t + c_2\sin t] - \delta_1[c_1\cos t + c_2\sin t]$.
$$
\ddot{u}_1 + u_1 = -\frac{1}{2}c_1[\cos t + \cos 3t] - \frac{1}{2}c_2[\sin 3t - \sin t] - \delta_1 c_1\cos t - \delta_1 c_2\sin t
$$
After using $\cos\alpha\cos\beta = \frac{1}{2}[\cos(\alpha + \beta) + \cos(\alpha - \beta)]$ and $\sin\alpha\cos\beta = \frac{1}{2}[\sin(\alpha + \beta) + \sin(\alpha - \beta)],$
we must suppress resonance.
So we have to focus on the $\sin t$ and $\cos t$ terms
$$
\ddot{u}_1 + u_1 = \sin t\left[\frac{1}{1}c_2 - \delta_1 c_2\right] + \cos t\left[-\frac{1}{2}c_1 - \delta_1 c_2\right] + \text{the rest}
$$
Then we must have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
c_2\left[\frac{1}{2} - \delta_1\right] & = & 0\\
c_1\left[\frac{1}{2} + \delta_1\right] & = & 0
\end{alignat*}
Therefore, $\delta_1 = \pm\frac{1}{2}$.
From the above, we have
$$
\delta(\epsilon) = 1 + \frac{1}{2}\epsilon + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^3)
$$
and
$$
\delta(\epsilon) = 1 - \frac{1}{2}\epsilon + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^3).
$$
 
Last edited:
At the bottom, what do I need $\delta_2$ to be?When $\delta = 4$, $\phi = 1$.
By Floquet, at 1, we need a period of $T$.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\ddot{u}_0 + 4u_0 & = & 0\\
\ddot{u}_1 + 4u_1 & = & -\delta_1u_0 - u_0\cos 2t\\
\ddot{u}_2 + 4u_2 & = & -\delta_1u_1 - \delta_2u_0 - u_1\cos 2t
\end{alignat*}
Then $u_0 = a\cos 2t + b\sin 2t$.
Therefore, we have $\ddot{u}_1 + 4u_1 = -\delta_1a\cos 2t - \delta_1b\sin 2t - \frac{a}{2}\cos 4t - \frac{a}{2} - \frac{b}{2}\sin 4t - \frac{b}{2}$.
$$
-\delta_1a = 0\quad\text{and}\quad -\delta_1b = 0\quad\Rightarrow\quad\delta_1 = 0
$$
So $\ddot{u}_1 + 4u_1 = - \frac{a}{2}\cos 4t - \frac{a}{2} - \frac{b}{2}\sin 4t - \frac{b}{2}$.
Letting
$$
u_1 = \sum_{j = 0}^{\infty}c_j\sin it + d_j\cos it.
$$
Then $u_1 = \frac{a}{24}\cos 4t - \frac{a}{8} + \frac{b}{24}\sin 4t$.
We have that
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\ddot{u}_2 + 4u_2 & = & -\delta_1\left(\frac{b}{16}\sin3t + \frac{a}{16}\cos 3t\right) - \delta_2a\cos t - \delta_2b\sin t - \frac{b}{32}\sin t - \frac{b}{32}\sin 5t\\
& & - \frac{a}{32}\cos t - \frac{a}{32}\cos 5t\\
& = & - \delta_2a\cos t - \delta_2b\sin t - \frac{b}{32}\sin t - \frac{b}{32}\sin 5t - \frac{a}{32}\cos t - \frac{a}{32}\cos 5t
\end{alignat*}
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K