Analyzing a Difference Equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of a difference equation derived from a differential equation, specifically focusing on the convergence of a series solution represented by the coefficients of the difference equation. Participants explore various methods to determine convergence and share their findings and challenges in the process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a difference equation and seeks methods to prove the convergence of the corresponding series solution.
  • Another participant suggests taking the limit as \( v \to \infty \) to analyze the behavior of the sequence, noting that while \( a_{v+2} \to a_v \), this does not constitute a proof of convergence.
  • A different participant challenges the previous reasoning by providing a counterexample where \( a_v = \ln v \) approaches a limit but does not converge, while also noting that specific initial conditions (e.g., \( a_0 = a_1 = 0 \)) lead to convergence.
  • One participant attempts a ratio test but finds it inconclusive, expressing frustration over the lack of clarity regarding convergence.
  • Another participant proposes expressing \( a_v \) in terms of two sequences, \( \alpha_v \) and \( \beta_v \), but remains uncertain about the implications of this approach.
  • A later post claims to have determined that the series converges within a certain radius around zero, linking it back to the original differential equation being studied.
  • This participant also mentions numerical computations suggesting that the series may break down earlier than expected, around \( x \approx \sin 1 \), based on extensive term calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the convergence of the series, with some proposing methods and others providing counterexamples. The discussion does not reach a consensus on a definitive method for proving convergence, although one participant claims to have found a solution regarding the radius of convergence.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their approaches, including the dependence on initial conditions and the challenges posed by the nature of the difference equation. There are unresolved mathematical steps and varying interpretations of convergence based on different assumptions.

Theia
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Hello!

I started to study a differential equation, and turned the problem into a difference equation ($$a_0, a_1 \in \mathbb{R}, a_2 = 0, a_3 = \frac{a_0 + a_1}{6}$$)

$$a_{v+2} = \frac{v^2a_v + a_{v-1}}{(v+1)(v+2)}$$, where $$v \ge 2$$.

The numbers $$a_v$$ are coefficients of a serie solution to the original differential equation.

But now the question: I'd like to prove if the serie converges or not (i.e. is it usefull at all). But how is this done in this case? As far as I can see, the difference equation has not err... a nice solution and so all I have is the difference equation. Sometimes I've seen, someone takes a limit of an equation and assumes $$a_{\infty} = a$$ and then substituting this into the equation. But this method clearly fails in this case. Are there another methods?

Thank you! ^^
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, well one thing you could say, if you were trying to take the limit as $v\to\infty$, is that
\begin{align*}
\lim_{v\to\infty}a_{v+2}&=\lim_{v\to\infty}\frac{v^2a_v+a_{v-1}}{v^2+3v+2} \\
&=\lim_{v\to\infty}\frac{a_v+\frac{a_{v-1}}{v^2}}{1+\frac{3}{v}+\frac{2}{v^2}}.
\end{align*}
From this, we see that $a_{v+2}\to a_v$. This isn't a proof of convergence, but I think I'd be shocked if it didn't.
 
Ackbach said:
Hmm, well one thing you could say, if you were trying to take the limit as $v\to\infty$, is that
\begin{align*}
\lim_{v\to\infty}a_{v+2}&=\lim_{v\to\infty}\frac{v^2a_v+a_{v-1}}{v^2+3v+2} \\
&=\lim_{v\to\infty}\frac{a_v+\frac{a_{v-1}}{v^2}}{1+\frac{3}{v}+\frac{2}{v^2}}.
\end{align*}
From this, we see that $a_{v+2}\to a_v$. This isn't a proof of convergence, but I think I'd be shocked if it didn't.

I'm afraid that doesn't quite fly.
Consider for instance $a_v = \ln v$ that satisfies the criterion $a_{v+2}\to a_v$. Successive terms get arbitrarily close to each other... but the sequence still does not converge.

Anyway, if we pick for instance $a_0=a_1=0$, the sequence does converge.
I'm not sure yet if it holds for the general case though.
 
*sigh* I've tried a ratio test to attack on this. Just to see that it is inconclusive... Also trying to write e.g. $$a_{v+4}$$ in terms of lower indices seems not to work and all I got was that $$a_{v+4} \to a_{v+2}$$, which we already know.

To make a numerical study, I coded a program that computes the coefficients until one of them is smaller than $$10^{-9}$$. If I got everything right, it looks like that needs about million terms (plus some hundreds of thousands terms depending on initial values)... But still, it is not saying anything does it really converge or not... Maybe this needs quite a tricky way to be handled properly. (Sadface)
 
... Nice. Post just disappeared. -.- Anyway, if one writes $$a_v = \alpha_va_0 + \beta_va_1$$, then one obtains two sequences pure numbers, namely

$$\alpha_0 = 1, \alpha_1 = \alpha_2 = 0, \alpha_3 = \frac{1}{6}, \ldots$$ and $$\beta_0 = 0, \beta_1 = 1, \beta_2 = 0, \beta_3 = \frac{1}{6}, \ldots$$.

Then one can compute more easily the continuation (the same original equation applies to both sequences). But does this help or not, I have no idea.
 
*phew* After some err... months(?!) I finally got an answer whether the serie - mentioned in the first post - converges or not. The answer is that there is some sort of radius of convergence around 0 where the serie converges and it is the solution for the ode I was studying (well... I'm still).

Shortly, I was/am studying ode $$y'' = y\sin x$$. Near $$x = 0$$ I derived another form of the ode, namely $$(1 - t^2)u'' -tu' - tu =0$$ ($$\ ' = \tfrac{d}{dt}$$), which clearly has singular points at $$t = \pm 1$$ (with the fact that substitution $$t = \sin x$$ was used), there is no point to try to search values other than $$|x| \le 1$$. But some numerical computations I made, gave me also a hint that the serie will break earlier, about at $$x \approx \sin 1$$. (Up to about 9 million terms used.)

Being such, I think this question is answered and case closed. I'll see what I can and want to do with the ode. Thank you again all the helpers! ^^
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K