Is |f(1)| = \inf\{\sup\{|f(t)+m(t)|: t \in [0,1]\} : m \in M\}?

  • Thread starter Thread starter .....
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the equation |f(1)| = inf{sup{|f(t)+m(t)|: t ∈ [0,1]} : m ∈ M}, where f is a continuous function on [0,1] and M is the set of continuous functions that equal 0 at 1. The participants analyze the implications of f(1) being 0 and propose a specific function m(t) = tf(1) - f(t) to explore cases where f(1) is not zero. The conclusion drawn is that the choice of m influences the supremum of the expression, impacting the validity of the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous functions on closed intervals
  • Familiarity with supremum and infimum concepts in real analysis
  • Knowledge of function manipulation and transformations
  • Basic principles of optimization in mathematical functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of continuous functions on closed intervals
  • Research supremum and infimum in the context of real analysis
  • Explore function transformations and their effects on continuity
  • Investigate optimization techniques in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of continuous functions and optimization techniques.

.....
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



f is a continuous function on [0,1]

M is the set of continuous functions on [0,1] which are 0 at 1 ... i.e. for all m in M, m(1) = 0

I want to know if it's true that

|f(1)| = \inf\{\sup\{|f(t)+m(t)|: t \in [0,1]\} : m \in M\}

The Attempt at a Solution



So... you're choosing t to make it as big as possible and choosing m to make it as small as possible...

If f(1)=0 then you could choose m = -f and then for any t f+m would be zero, so the whole thing would be zero and the equation would be true...

But I'm not sure about the f(1) not equal to 0 case...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try inserting:
m(t) = tf(1)-f(t)
The idea is basically the same as yours except that instead of keeping |f(t)+m(t)| constantly at 0 we make it increasing so it has supremum at t=1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K