Analyzing Singularities in Complex Functions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of singularities in complex functions, specifically examining points of interest such as branch points, essential singularities, and removable singularities. Participants explore various functions, including f(z)=√z and f(z)=z cos(z), and their behavior at specific points like z=0 and z=∞.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that z=0 is a branch point for f(z)=√z, while questioning if it can also be considered a zero.
  • Others affirm that the square root of 0 is indeed 0, suggesting agreement on this point.
  • A participant inquires whether z=∞ is an essential singularity for f(z)=z cos(z), to which another participant responds affirmatively, stating that any analytic function that is not a polynomial has an essential singularity at infinity.
  • Another participant raises a question about f(z)=z cos(1/z) and whether the existence of a limit at z=0 indicates a singularity, expressing a belief that there is a singularity present.
  • One participant challenges the existence of a limit at z=0, arguing that the limit depends on the direction of approach, thus suggesting that the limit does not exist.
  • Another participant advises looking for points where the function is not defined, but counters this by providing the example of sin(z)/z, which has a removable singularity at z=0.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the definitions of poles and essential singularities, with a participant explaining that a function has an essential singularity at z=z0 if no finite n can make the function analytic by multiplying by (z-z0)^n.
  • In the case of f(z)=z cos(1/z), it is noted that the series expansion indicates an essential singularity at z=0.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of singularities, particularly regarding the limit at z=0 for f(z)=z cos(1/z) and whether it constitutes a singularity. There is no consensus on the approach to identifying singularities, with some advocating for examining undefined points and others emphasizing the importance of limits.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the direction of approach to z=0 and the varying definitions of singularities among participants. The discussion also highlights the complexity of determining the nature of singularities in different functions.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi all

We look at f(z)=\sqrt z. Here the point z0=0 is a branch point, but can/is z0=0 also regarded as a zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:
Hi all

We look at f(z)=\sqrt z. Here the point z0=0 is a branch point, but can/is z0=0 also regarded as a zero?
Yes, the square root of 0 is 0.
 
Thanks. It is kind of you to help me. I have another question related to complex analysis, which I hope you will help me with.

Is it correct that z_0=\infty is an essential singularity for f(z)=z\cos z?
 
Yes, any analytic function that is not a polynomial has an essential singularity at infinity.
 
Thanks!
 
I have a question similar to my previous one, so I thought I could just ask it here, instead of creating a new thread.

In my book it says: "A function f which is not analytic - or even necessarily defined - at a point z is said to have a singularity at z ...". In the case of f(z)=z\cos(1/z), then the function is not defined for z_0=0, but the limit does exist, and it is 0.

Does this mean that there is a singularity there or not? I believe that there is, but I would very much like for someone to confirm this.

I really appreciate your help. Thank you very much in advance.
 
Last edited:
The limit only exists if it doesn't depend from which way you approach z = 0. If you approach it from the real axis, then the limit is zero. But if you approach it from the imiaginary axis, the limit is not zero. So, you don't have a limit that is independent on the way you approach the limit point so "the" limit for z = 0 does not exist.
 
I see. Would you advise me just to look for the points where the function is not defined, just like my book says? This way (if you do advise me to do this), then I don't have to worry about limits, and which way they are approached from.

Thanks for replying.
 
Niles said:
I see. Would you advise me just to look for the points where the function is not defined, just like my book says? This way (if you do advise me to do this), then I don't have to worry about limits, and which way they are approached from.

Thanks for replying.


That won't work, because if the function is sin(z)/z, then the function is not defined at z = 0 either, yet the limit does exist and is equal to 1.

So, you have a "removalbe singularity", which means that you can define the value at the undefined point z = 0 to be equal to 1, and then the function is continuous and even analytic.

Now, when you are dealing with functions that are analytic except for possible exception points, the only tyupes of sungularities are poles, branch point singularites or essential singularities.

Poles are singularties around which the expansion starts with a negative power. If the expnsion around z = z_0 starts like:

a (z-z_0)^(-n) + b (z-z_0)^(-n+1) + ...

then we say that the pole is of order n. Then mltiplying the function by (z-z_0)^n would yield an analytic function (you can then define it at the point z = z_0 such that it become analytic there).

A function f(z) has an essential singularity at z = z_0 if there does not exist a finite n such that multiplying the function by (z-z_0)^n will make the function analytic. So for all n > 0 the function (z-z_0)^n f(z) is singular at z = z_0.

I case of your example, you can see from the series expansion of
cos(1/z) that it has an essential singularity for z = 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K