Analyzing the Analyticity of f(z)=Log(z-2i+1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter strangequark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Click For Summary
The function f(z) = Log(z - 2i + 1) is analytic except at the point z = -1 + 2i and along the positive real axis due to the branch cut associated with the logarithm. The logarithm is defined as Log((x + 1) + i(y - 2)), leading to discontinuities at these locations. To determine differentiability elsewhere, applying the Cauchy-Riemann equations to the real and imaginary parts is necessary. The argument function, Arg(z), can be expressed using arctangent, but care must be taken with its definition. Overall, the function is differentiable in regions away from the identified discontinuities.
strangequark
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find where the function: f(z)=Log(z-2i+1) is analytic and where it is differentiable.


Homework Equations



Cauchy-Riemann equations?

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's where I am so far:
Log(z-2i+1)=Log((x+1)+i(y-2))=ln(\sqrt{(x+1)^{2}+(y-2)^{2}})+iArg(z)

since I'm only looking at the principal value of the logarithm, 0<\theta\leq2\pi (this is the textbook's choice of principal arguement), then
ln(\sqrt{(x+1)^{2}+(y-2)^{2}}) will be discontinuous at x=-1 and y=2... and the function is undefined everywhere on the positive real axis (because of the choice of argument). So, f(z) is non-differentiable at z=-1+2i and everywhere in the positive direction on the real axis extending from the point z=-1, because that is the "center" of my mapping.

Now, I'm not sure how to show that it is differentiable everywhere else... Am I supposed to apply the cauchy-riemann equations to u=ln(\sqrt{(x+1)^{2}+(y-2)^{2}}) and v=Arg(z)? If so, how do I take a partial derivative of Arg(z)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know where Log(z) is analytic? I think it's everywhere except along the branch cut you use to make it well defined, right? Then just translate by 2i-1. I don't think you need to get carried away with details.
 
Last edited:
i was thinking something along the lines of using Arg(z)=arctan(\frac{y-2}{x+1}) but I'm unsure how to define the inverse tangent... but if I let Arg(z)=2arctan(\frac{y-2}{x+1})+C, where C is an arbitrary constant, then the cauchy-riemann equations will be satisfied... not sure why yet... my trig is not good...

but anyway, yeah, i like your way better... you're right in that it's probably sufficient for this excercise...

thanks!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K